Literature DB >> 15199357

Outcomes of elderly patients with cardiogenic shock treated with early percutaneous revascularization.

Abhiram Prasad1, Ryan J Lennon, Charanjit S Rihal, Peter B Berger, David R Holmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subgroup analysis from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial indicated that patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who were > or =75 years old did not benefit from early revascularization and may have been harmed; their mortality rate at 30 days was 75%. The applicability of this subset analysis from a select patient population enrolled in a randomized trial to the general population is unclear.
METHODS: At the Mayo Clinic between 1991 and 2000, we evaluated the outcome of all patients > or =75 years old with CS caused by MI who underwent urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
RESULTS: The study included 61 patients with a mean age of 79.5 +/- 3 years; 21% of these patients had a history of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 41% had had a prior MI, 28% had diabetes mellitus, and 18% had a history of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). PCI was performed 8.0 +/- 7.2 hours after onset of MI. Angiographic success (<50% residual stenosis) was achieved in 91% of the lesions that were dilated. In hospital outcomes included death (44%), CABG (1.6%), and CVA (4.9%). The 30-day mortality rate was 47%. The estimated survival rate 1 year after discharge (Kaplan Meier method) was 75%.
CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm a high early mortality rate among patients > or =75 years old with MI complicated by CS, but suggest that among patients referred for angiography, outcomes may be better than previously believed when early revascularization is performed. In this population, 56% of patients survived to be discharged from the hospital, and of the hospital survivors, 75% were alive at 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15199357     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Abdulla A Damluji; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Carol Berkower; Cynthia M Boyd; Mohammed S Al-Damluji; Mauricio G Cohen; Daniel E Forman; Rahul Chaudhary; Gary Gerstenblith; Jeremy D Walston; Jon R Resar; Mauro Moscucci
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Sharonne N Hayes; Patricia J M Best; Jorge A Brenes-Salazar; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Prognostic Analysis for Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Mao-Jen Lin; Chun-Yu Chen; Hau-De Lin; Han-Ping Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  One-year clinical outcomes in invasive treatment strategies for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yeon Pyo Yoo; Ki-Woon Kang; Hyeon Soo Yoon; Jin Cheol Myung; Yu Jeong Choi; Won Ho Kim; Sang Hyun Park; Kyung Tae Jung; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.