Literature DB >> 30999991

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Abdulla A Damluji1, Karen Bandeen-Roche2, Carol Berkower3, Cynthia M Boyd4, Mohammed S Al-Damluji5, Mauricio G Cohen6, Daniel E Forman7, Rahul Chaudhary3, Gary Gerstenblith8, Jeremy D Walston4, Jon R Resar8, Mauro Moscucci9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults ≥75 years of age carry an increased risk of mortality after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in older adults with STEMI and shock and its influence on in-hospital mortality.
METHODS: We used a large publicly available all-payer inpatient health care database sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality between 1999 and 2013. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The influence of PCI on in-hospital mortality was assessed by quintiles of propensity score (PS).
RESULTS: Of the 317,728 encounters with STEMI and shock in the United States, 111,901 (35%) were adults age ≥75 years. Of these, 53% were women and 83% were Caucasians. The median number of chronic conditions was 8 (interquartile range: 6 to 10). The diagnosis of STEMI and cardiogenic shock in older patients decreased significantly over time (proportion of older adults with STEMI and shock: 1999: 42% vs. 2013: 29%). Concomitantly, the rate of PCI utilization in older adults increased (1999: 27% vs. 2013: 56%, p < 0.001), with declining in-hospital mortality rates (1999: 64% vs. 2013: 46%; p < 0.001). Utilizing PS matching methods, PCI was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality across quintiles of propensity score (Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45 to 0.51). This reduction in hospital mortality risk was seen across the 4 different U.S. census bureau regions (adjusted odds ratio: Northeast: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.47; Midwest: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.57; South: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.56; West: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.53).
CONCLUSIONS: This large and contemporary analysis shows that utilization of PCI in older adults with STEMI and cardiogenic shock is increasing and paralleled by a substantial reduction in mortality. Although clinical judgment is critical, older adults should not be excluded from early revascularization based on age in the absence of absolute contraindications.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; mortality; older adults; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30999991      PMCID: PMC7185801          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  34 in total

1.  Comparing different strategies for timing of dialysis initiation through inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Arvid Sjölander; Olof Nyrén; Rino Bellocco; Marie Evans
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Propensity score methods for confounding control in nonexperimental research.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Richard Wyss; J Bradley Layton; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

3.  Prognosis of elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 2001 to 2011: A report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) registry.

Authors:  Matthijs A Velders; Stefan K James; Berglind Libungan; Giovanna Sarno; Ole Fröbert; Jörg Carlsson; Martin J Schalij; Per Albertsson; Bo Lagerqvist
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Comparative effectiveness of early versus conventional timing of dialysis initiation in advanced CKD.

Authors:  Deidra C Crews; Julia J Scialla; L Ebony Boulware; Sankar D Navaneethan; Joseph V Nally; Xiaobo Liu; Susana Arrigain; Jesse D Schold; Patti L Ephraim; Stacey E Jolly; Stephen M Sozio; Wieneke M Michels; Dana C Miskulin; Navdeep Tangri; Tariq Shafi; Albert W Wu; Karen Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Association between periprocedural bleeding and long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in older patients.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; David Dai; Sumeet Subherwal; William S Weintraub; Ralph S Brindis; John C Messenger; Renato D Lopes; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 6.  Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Nancy M Albert; Timothy D Henry; Alice K Jacobs; Navin K Kapur; Ahmet Kilic; Venu Menon; E Magnus Ohman; Nancy K Sweitzer; Holger Thiele; Jeffrey B Washam; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock treatment and outcomes among ontario patients with myocardial infarction between 1992 and 2008.

Authors:  Husam M Abdel-Qadir; Joan Ivanov; Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Vladimír Dzavík
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-06-28

8.  Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR.

Authors:  Monique L Anderson; Eric D Peterson; S Andrew Peng; Tracy Y Wang; E Magnus Ohman; Deepak L Bhatt; Jorge F Saucedo; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-11-12

9.  Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer; Albrecht Vogt; Ralf Zahn; Michael A Weber; Ulrich Tebbe; Martin Gottwik; Tassilo Bonzel; Jochen Senges; Karl-Ludwig Neuhaus
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Sajid Shahul; Michele R Hacker; Victor Novack; Ariel Mueller; Shahzad Shaefi; Bilal Mahmood; Syed Haider Ali; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Approach to Management in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Abdulla A Damluji; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

2.  Cardiogenic Shock From Heart Failure Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics, Hospital Course, and 1-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Shashank S Sinha; Carolyn M Rosner; Behnam N Tehrani; Aneel Maini; Alexander G Truesdell; Seiyon Ben Lee; Pramita Bagchi; James Cameron; Abdulla A Damluji; Mehul Desai; Shashank S Desai; Kelly C Epps; Christopher deFilippi; M Casey Flanagan; Leonard Genovese; Hala Moukhachen; James J Park; Mitchell A Psotka; Anika Raja; Palak Shah; Matthew W Sherwood; Ramesh Singh; Daniel Tang; Karl D Young; Timothy Welch; Christopher M O'Connor; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 10.447

3.  Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Sharonne N Hayes; Patricia J M Best; Jorge A Brenes-Salazar; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Evolving paradigms in cardiogenic shock care.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Carolyn M Rosner; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 5.682

6.  Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.

Authors:  Joseph I Wang; Daniel Y Lu; Dmitriy N Feldman; Stephen A McCullough; Parag Goyal; Maria G Karas; Irina Sobol; Evelyn M Horn; Luke K Kim; Udhay Krishnan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Zhixun Bai; Shan Hu; Yan Wang; Wenwen Deng; Ning Gu; Ranzun Zhao; Wei Zhang; Yi Ma; Zhenglong Wang; Zhijiang Liu; Changyin Shen; Bei Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

Review 8.  Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Abdulla A Damluji; Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Venu Menon; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Marie Bakitas; Mauricio G Cohen; Leora B Balsam; Joanna Chikwe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 39.918

9.  Transradial access in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Stratified analysis by shock severity.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Abdulla A Damluji; Matthew W Sherwood; Carolyn Rosner; Alexander G Truesdell; Kelly C Epps; Edward Howard; Scott D Barnett; Anika Raja; Christopher R deFilippi; Charles E Murphy; Christopher M O'Connor; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.585

10.  Epidemiology of Geographic Disparities of Myocardial Infarction Among Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of 2000-2017 Medicare Data.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Igor Akushevich; Arseniy P Yashkin; Julia Kravchenko
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.