Literature DB >> 15198697

Bipedal animals, and their differences from humans.

R McN Alexander1.   

Abstract

Humans, birds and (occasionally) apes walk bipedally. Humans, birds, many lizards and (at their highest speeds) cockroaches run bipedally. Kangaroos, some rodents and many birds hop bipedally, and jerboas and crows use a skipping gait. This paper deals only with walking and running bipeds. Chimpanzees walk with their knees bent and their backs sloping forward. Most birds walk and run with their backs and femurs sloping at small angles to the horizontal, and with their knees bent. These differences from humans make meaningful comparisons of stride length, duty factor, etc., difficult, even with the aid of dimensionless parameters that would take account of size differences, if dynamic similarity were preserved. Lizards and cockroaches use wide trackways. Humans exert a two-peaked pattern of force on the ground when walking, and an essentially single-peaked pattern when running. The patterns of force exerted by apes and birds are never as markedly two-peaked as in fast human walking. Comparisons with quadrupedal mammals of the same body mass show that human walking is relatively economical of metabolic energy, and human running is expensive. Bipedal locomotion is remarkably economical for wading birds, and expensive for geese and penguins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15198697      PMCID: PMC1571302          DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00289.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  24 in total

1.  Muscle force-length dynamics during level versus incline locomotion: a comparison of in vivo performance of two guinea fowl ankle extensors.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The biomechanics of skipping gaits: a third locomotion paradigm?

Authors:  A E Minetti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dynamic plantar pressure distribution during terrestrial locomotion of bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  Evie Vereecke; Kristiaan D'Août; Dirk De Clercq; Linda Van Elsacker; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1977-11

5.  Fourier analysis of forces exerted in walking and running.

Authors:  R M Alexander; A S Jayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of the hind-limb cycles during voluntary bipedal and quadrupedal walking in bonobos (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  P Aerts; R Van Damme; L Van Elsacker; V Duchêne
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Characteristics of ground reaction forces in normal and chimpanzee-like bipedal walking by humans.

Authors:  Y Li; R H Crompton; R M Alexander; M M Günther; W J Wang
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  A field study of the effects of incline on the escape locomotion of a bipedal lizard, Callisaurus draconoides.

Authors:  D J Irschick; B C Jayne
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.247

9.  Comparative three-dimensional kinematics of the hindlimb for high-speed bipedal and quadrupedal locomotion of lizards

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; N C Heglund; G M Maloiy
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  35 in total

1.  Stride lengths, speed and energy costs in walking of Australopithecus afarensis: using evolutionary robotics to predict locomotion of early human ancestors.

Authors:  William I Sellers; Gemma M Cain; Weijie Wang; Robin H Crompton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Dynamics of quadrupedal locomotion of monkeys: implications for central control.

Authors:  Yongqing Xiang; Padmore John; Sergei B Yakushin; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Strategies for obstacle avoidance during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Kevin M I Chu; Sandy H Seto; Irina N Beloozerova; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Authors:  P J Bishop; C J Clemente; R E Weems; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 6.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Hip joint contact force in the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) during normal level walking.

Authors:  Jessica E Goetz; Timothy R Derrick; Douglas R Pedersen; Duane A Robinson; Michael G Conzemius; Thomas E Baer; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Mechanisms for the acquisition of habitual bipedality: are there biomechanical reasons for the acquisition of upright bipedal posture?

Authors:  Holger Preuschoft
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 9.  Locomotion in bonobos (Pan paniscus): differences and similarities between bipedal and quadrupedal terrestrial walking, and a comparison with other locomotor modes.

Authors:  K D'Août; E Vereecke; K Schoonaert; D De Clercq; L Van Elsacker; P Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 10.  Human and avian running on uneven ground: a model-based comparison.

Authors:  R Müller; A V Birn-Jeffery; Y Blum
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.