Literature DB >> 7086334

Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals.

C R Taylor, N C Heglund, G M Maloiy.   

Abstract

This series of four papers investigates the link between the energetics and the mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. Two experimental variables are used throughout the study: speed and body size. Mass-specific metabolic rates of running animals can be varied by about tenfold using either variable. This first paper considers metabolic energy consumed during terrestrial locomotion. New data relating rate of oxygen consumption and speed are reported for: eight species of wild and domestic artiodactyls; seven species of carnivores; four species of primates; and one species of rodent. These are combined with previously published data to formulate a new allometric equation relating mass-specific rates of oxygen consumed (VO2/Mb) during locomotion at a constant speed to speed and body mass (based on data from 62 avian and mammalian species): VO2/Mb = 0.533 Mb-0.316.vg + 0.300 Mb-0.303 where VO2/Mb has the units ml O2 s-1 kg-1; Mb is in kg; and vg is in m s-1. This equation can be expressed in terms of mass-specific rates of energy consumption (Emetab/Mb) using the energetic equivalent of 1 ml O2 = 20.1 J because the contribution of anaerobic glycolysis was negligible: Emetab/Mb = 10.7 Mb-0.316.vg + 6.03 Mb-0.303 where Emetab/Mb has the units watts/kg. This new relationship applies equally well to bipeds and quadrupeds and differs little from the allometric equation reported 12 years ago by Taylor, Schmid-Nielsen & Raab (1970). Ninety per cent of the values calculated from this genera equation for the diverse assortment of avian and mammalian species included in this regression fall within 25% of the observed values at the middle of the speed range where measurements were made. This agreement is impressive when one considers that mass-specific rates of oxygen consumption differed by more than 1400% over this size range of animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7086334     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.97.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  94 in total

1.  To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes.

Authors:  L M Bautista; J Tinbergen; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Gait transition cost in humans.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; John E A Bertram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Adults have lower stroke rate during submaximal front crawl swimming than children.

Authors:  Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Robert Keig Stallman; James Stray-Gundersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Acquisition of bipedalism: the Miocene hominoid record and modern analogues for bipedal protohominids.

Authors:  Masato Nakatsukasa
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners.

Authors:  Philo U Saunders; David B Pyne; Richard D Telford; John A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Avoidance of overheating and selection for both hair loss and bipedality in hominins.

Authors:  Graeme D Ruxton; David M Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Maximum velocity of shortening of three fibre types from horse soleus muscle: implications for scaling with body size.

Authors:  L C Rome; A A Sosnicki; D O Goble
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; Nathalie Pettorelli; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Scaling of skeletal muscle shortening velocity in mammals representing a 100,000-fold difference in body size.

Authors:  James O Marx; M Charlotte Olsson; Lars Larsson
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.