Literature DB >> 18553074

Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing.

Robert Volcic1, Joram J van Rheede, Albert Postma, Astrid M L Kappers.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of non-informative vision and visual interference upon haptic spatial processing, which supposedly derives from an interaction between an allocentric and egocentric reference frame. To this end, a haptic parallelity task served as baseline to determine the participant-dependent biasing influence of the egocentric reference frame. As expected, large systematic participant-dependent deviations from veridicality were observed. In the second experiment we probed the effect of non-informative vision on the egocentric bias. Moreover, orienting mechanisms (gazing directions) were studied with respect to the presentation of haptic information in a specific hemispace. Non-informative vision proved to have a beneficial effect on haptic spatial processing. No effect of gazing direction or hemispace was observed. In the third experiment we investigated the effect of simultaneously presented interfering visual information on the haptic bias. Interfering visual information parametrically influenced haptic performance. The interplay of reference frames that subserves haptic spatial processing was found to be related to both the effects of non-informative vision and visual interference. These results suggest that spatial representations are influenced by direct cross-modal interactions; inter-participant differences in the haptic modality resulted in differential effects of the visual modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18553074      PMCID: PMC2515586          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1447-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Astrid M L Kappers; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 3.  Approaches to the study of haptic sensing.

Authors:  Denise Y P Henriques; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers; Roderik F Viergever
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The structure of frontoparallel haptic space is task dependent.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Astrid M L Kappers; Stan C A M Gielen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-01

6.  Direction of gaze during vibrotactile choice reaction time tasks.

Authors:  J M Pierson; J L Bradshaw; T F Meyer; M J Howard; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  A hybrid frame of reference for visuo-manual coordination.

Authors:  M Carrozzo; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Allocentric and egocentric reference frames in the processing of three-dimensional haptic space.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier; Johan Lataster; Mirella Fingal; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Keep an eye on your hands: on the role of visual mechanisms in processing of haptic space.

Authors:  Albert Postma; Sander Zuidhoek; Matthijs L Noordzij; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-01-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task.

Authors:  Astrid M L Kappers; Wouter B Schakel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.

Authors:  Hanneke I van Mier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adults' spatial scaling: evidence from the haptic domain.

Authors:  Magdalena Szubielska; Wenke Möhring
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-05-03

4.  Relative posture between head and finger determines perceived tactile direction of motion.

Authors:  Yueh-Peng Chen; Chun-I Yeh; Tsung-Chi Lee; Jian-Jia Huang; Yu-Cheng Pei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Influence of action video gaming on spatial representation in the haptic modality.

Authors:  Hanneke I Van Mier; Hui Jiao
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.