Literature DB >> 15193546

Creation and characterization of a mouse model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Tony D Fang1, Randall P Nacamuli, HanJoon M Song, Kenton D Fong, Stephen M Warren, Ali Salim, Richard A D Carano, Ellen H Filvaroff, Michael T Longaker.   

Abstract

While the histological and ultrastructural changes associated with distraction osteogenesis have been extensively characterized using various animal models, the molecular mechanisms governing this technique remain poorly understood. In the current study, for the first time, we describe a mouse mandibular distraction osteogenesis model. Development of this model will allow assessment of factors involved in normal vs. abnormal healing (especially in non-unions) of craniofacial skeletal elements. Complete osteotomies were created on the right hemimandibles of 51 adult male CD-1 mice and customized distraction devices attached. Thirty-three animals underwent gradual distraction (5 days latency, distraction at 0.2 mm BID x 8 days, 28 days consolidation), while the remaining 18 mice underwent acute lengthening (immediate distraction to 3.2 mm) at the time of surgery. Mandibles were harvested at time points corresponding to the latent (POD 5), distraction (POD 9, 13), and consolidation (POD 28, 41) periods and processed for histological or quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis. Specimens from each group were processed for microCT analysis. Histological and radiological data demonstrated that all mandibles undergoing gradual distraction achieved complete bony union by the end of consolidation, while those undergoing acute lengthening formed a fibrous non-union. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR demonstrated upregulation of mRNA for VEGF, FGF-2, collagen I, and osteopontin during gradual distraction but not during acute lengthening. These data validate our novel mouse mandibular distraction model and demonstrate its utility in elucidating the molecular mechanisms regulating bone formation during distraction osteogenesis as compared to those that are expressed during the formation of fibrous non-unions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193546     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  6 in total

1.  Relationships between tissue dilatation and differentiation in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Michael T Longaker; Dennis R Carter
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 2.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Architecture and microstructure of cortical bone in reconstructed canine mandibles after bone transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Emily K Halvachs; Paul C Dechow; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Mandibular Distraction in a Patient With Type II Collagenopathy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Garza; Jennifer C Alyono; David W Dorfman; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Inhibin A enhances bone formation during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Daniel S Perrien; Kristy M Nicks; Lichu Liu; Nisreen S Akel; Anthony W Bacon; Robert A Skinner; Frances L Swain; James Aronson; Larry J Suva; Dana Gaddy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Mechanical force-induced midpalatal suture remodeling in mice.

Authors:  Bo Hou; Naomi Fukai; Bjorn R Olsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.398

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.