Literature DB >> 26521184

Detection of cervical lesions by multivariate analysis of diffuse reflectance spectra: a clinical study.

Vasumathi Gopala Prabitha1, Sambasivan Suchetha2, Jayaraj Lalitha Jayanthi2, Kamalasanan Vijayakumary Baiju3, Prabhakaran Rema2, Koyippurath Anuraj1, Anita Mathews2, Paul Sebastian2, Narayanan Subhash4,5.   

Abstract

Diffuse reflectance (DR) spectroscopy is a non-invasive, real-time, and cost-effective tool for early detection of malignant changes in squamous epithelial tissues. The present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic power of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for non-invasive discrimination of cervical lesions in vivo. A clinical trial was carried out on 48 sites in 34 patients by recording DR spectra using a point-monitoring device with white light illumination. The acquired data were analyzed and classified using multivariate statistical analysis based on principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Diagnostic accuracies were validated using random number generators. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for evaluating the discriminating power of the proposed statistical technique. An algorithm was developed and used to classify non-diseased (normal) from diseased sites (abnormal) with a sensitivity of 72 % and specificity of 87 %. While low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) could be discriminated from normal with a sensitivity of 56 % and specificity of 80 %, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) from normal with a sensitivity of 89 % and specificity of 97 %, LSIL could be discriminated from HSIL with 100 % sensitivity and specificity. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.993 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.0 to 1) and 1 (95 % CI 1) for the discrimination of HSIL from normal and HSIL from LSIL, respectively. The results of the study show that DR spectroscopy could be used along with multivariate analytical techniques as a non-invasive technique to monitor cervical disease status in real time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer detection; Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy; Linear discriminant analysis; Multivariate analysis; Optical biopsy; Principal component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26521184     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-015-1829-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  34 in total

1.  Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.

Authors:  L Stewart Massad; Yvonne C Collins
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Effect of probe pressure on cervical fluorescence spectroscopy measurements.

Authors:  Audrey Nath; Kelley Rivoire; Sung Chang; Dennis Cox; E Neely Atkinson; Michele Follen; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Introducing HPV vaccine in developing countries--key challenges and issues.

Authors:  Jan M Agosti; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Cervical precancer detection using a multivariate statistical algorithm based on laser-induced fluorescence spectra at multiple excitation wavelengths.

Authors:  N Ramanujam; M F Mitchell; A Mahadevan-Jansen; S L Thomsen; G Staerkel; A Malpica; T Wright; N Atkinson; R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Julia K S Gallwas; Lisa Turk; Herbert Stepp; Susanna Mueller; Robert Ochsenkuehn; Klaus Friese; Christian Dannecker
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Cervical cytologic abnormalities and negative colposcopy: histologic assessment.

Authors:  R. Chenoy; S. Manohar; C.W.E. Redman; D.M. Luesley
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  A clinical study of optical biopsy of the uterine cervix using a multispectral imaging system.

Authors:  Irene M Orfanoudaki; George C Themelis; Stavros K Sifakis; Despina H Fragouli; John G Panayiotides; Eleftheria M Vazgiouraki; Eugenios E Koumantakis
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Diagnosis of breast cancer using fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: a Monte-Carlo-model-based approach.

Authors:  Changfang Zhu; Gregory M Palmer; Tara M Breslin; Josephine Harter; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Oxygenated hemoglobin diffuse reflectance ratio for in vivo detection of oral pre-cancer.

Authors:  Rupananda Mallia; Shiny Sara Thomas; Anitha Mathews; Rejnish Kumar; Paul Sebastian; Jayaprakash Madhavan; Narayanan Subhash
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in the cervix with quantitative spectroscopy and per-patient normalization.

Authors:  Jelena Mirkovic; Condon Lau; Sasha McGee; Christopher Crum; Kamran Badizadegan; Michael Feld; Elizabeth Stier
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.

Authors:  Tatiana Novikova
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Label-free, High-Resolution Optical Metabolic Imaging of Human Cervical Precancers Reveals Potential for Intraepithelial Neoplasia Diagnosis.

Authors:  Dimitra Pouli; Hong-Thao Thieu; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Baecher-Lind; Michael House; Brian Bond; Danielle M Roncari; Megan L Evans; Francisca Rius-Diaz; Karl Munger; Irene Georgakoudi
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2020-05-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.