Literature DB >> 15187196

Important differentiation of factors that predict outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients with different degrees of residual renal function.

Angela Yee-Moon Wang1, Jean Woo, Mei Wang, Mandy Man-Mei Sea, John E Sanderson, Siu-Fai Lui, Philip Kam-Tao Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual renal function (RRF) is an important predictor of outcome in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Whether results from survival studies in dialysis patients with RRF can also be extrapolated to anuric patients remains uncertain. In this observational study, we examined the characteristics of PD patients with a residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 vs those with complete anuria and differentiated factors that predict outcome in the two groups of patients.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (39% being completely anuric) were recruited from a single regional dialysis centre. Assessments of haemodynamic, echocardiographic, nutritional and biochemical parameters and indices of dialysis adequacy were done at study baseline and were related to outcomes.
RESULTS: During the prospective follow-up of 30.8+/-13.8 (mean+/-SD) months, 28.0% of patients with residual GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 vs 50.5% of anuric patients had died (P = 0.005). The overall 2 year patient survival was 89.7 and 65.0% for patients with GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and anuric patients, respectively (P = 0.0012). Compared with patients with GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, anuric patients were dialysed for longer (P<0.001), were more anaemic (P<0.005), and had higher calcium-phosphorus product (P<0.01), higher C-reactive protein (P<0.001), lower serum albumin (P<0.05), greater prevalence of malnutrition according to subjective global assessment (P<0.05) and more severe cardiac hypertrophy (P<0.001) at baseline. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, serum albumin, left ventricular mass index and residual GFR were significant factors associated with mortality in patients with GFR > or =1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, while increasing age, atherosclerotic vascular disease and higher C-reactive protein were associated with greater mortality in anuric PD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates more adverse cardiovascular, inflammatory, nutritional and metabolic profiles as well as higher mortality in anuric PD patients. Furthermore, factors associated with mortality are also not equivalent for PD patients with and without RRF, suggesting that patients with and without RRF are qualitatively different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15187196     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  30 in total

1.  The importance of residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Dorota Sikorska; Krzysztof Pawlaczyk; Anna Olewicz-Gawlik; Natasza Czepulis; Bartlomiej Posnik; Ewa Baum; Maria Wanic-Kossowska; Bengt Lindholm; Andrzej Oko
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Effect of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis solution on residual renal function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eun-Young Seo; Sook Hee An; Jang-Hee Cho; Hae Sun Suh; Sun-Hee Park; Hyesun Gwak; Yong-Lim Kim; Hunjoo Ha
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  A load volume suitable for reaching dialysis adequacy targets in anuric patients on 4-exchange CAPD.

Authors:  Giovambattista Virga; Vincenzo La Milia; Roberto Russo; Luciana Bonfante; Gian Maria Iadarola; Stefano Maffei; Massimo Sandrini; Matthias Zeiler; Maurizio Nordio
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  Effluent free radicals are associated with residual renal function and predict technique failure in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Morinaga; Hitoshi Sugiyama; Tatsuyuki Inoue; Keiichi Takiue; Yoko Kikumoto; Masashi Kitagawa; Shigeru Akagi; Kazushi Nakao; Yohei Maeshima; Ikuko Miyazaki; Masato Asanuma; Makoto Hiramatsu; Hirofumi Makino
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  Is incremental hemodialysis ready to return on the scene? From empiricism to kinetic modelling.

Authors:  Carlo Basile; Francesco Gaetano Casino; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Reduced residual renal function is associated with endothelial dysfunction in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Seung Hyeok Han; Sang Choel Lee; Ea Wha Kang; Jung Kyung Park; Hyang Sook Yoon; Tae-Hyun Yoo; Kyu Hun Choi; Dae-Suk Han; Shin-Wook Kang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Nutrition parameters as hemodialysis adequacy markers.

Authors:  R Stolic; G Trajkovic; D Stolic; V Peric; G Subaric-Gorgieva
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  Residual renal function and nutrition in young patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Isabella Guzzo; Elvira Mancini; Séverin Kengne Wafo; Lucilla Ravà; Stefano Picca
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Is residual renal function and better phosphate control in peritoneal dialysis an answer for the lower prevalence of valve calcification compared to hemodialysis patients?

Authors:  Merita Rroji; Saimir Seferi; Majlinda Cafka; Elizana Petrela; Erjola Likaj; Myftar Barbullushi; Nestor Thereska; Goce Spasovski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Effects of vitamin D on parathyroid hormone and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Roberto Russo; Marinella Ruospo; Mario Cozzolino; Luca De Nicola; Andrea Icardi; Ernesto Paoletti; Sandro Mazzaferro
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.