Literature DB >> 24570073

A load volume suitable for reaching dialysis adequacy targets in anuric patients on 4-exchange CAPD.

Giovambattista Virga1, Vincenzo La Milia, Roberto Russo, Luciana Bonfante, Gian Maria Iadarola, Stefano Maffei, Massimo Sandrini, Matthias Zeiler, Maurizio Nordio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) depuration indexes are targeted to get a minimum total weekly peritoneal urea clearance (Kt/V) of 1.70 and creatinine clearance/1.73 m(2) (pCrCL) of 50 l. In anuric patients these targets are difficult to achieve. Since dialysis volumes (load, VOL(in); drain, VOL(out)) are the main determinants of peritoneal clearances (pCLs), we aimed to estimate the minimum volumes required to fulfill these targets in anuric patients.
METHODS: Sixty-nine CAPD anuric patients from eight dialysis units were observed retrospectively. Demographic data, dialysis schedule, VOLs and depuration indexes were recorded. The relationship between normalized VOLs and pCLs was estimated by linear regression analysis as a whole (95 % confidence interval of the fit) and stratified by tertiles of body weight (BW) and surface area (BSA).
RESULTS: Mean weekly pKt/V was 1.89 ± 0.29, pCrCL 52.9 ± 8.0, VOL(in) 32.9 ± 5.3 ml/kg and VOL(out) 37.4 ± 6.7 ml/kg exchange. VOL(in) and VOL(out) correlated with depuration indexes only if normalized. A VOL(in) of 28.5 ml/kg exchange (27.0-30.0) was associated with a pKt/V of 1.70, and a VOL(in) of 29.5 (26.5-31.5) with a pCrCL of 50 l, with a VOL(out) of 31.7 ml/kg (29.5-33.5) and 32.4 (27.2-35.5), respectively. Smaller patients needed a lower normalized VOL(in)/exchange to obtain pKt/V = 1.70 (1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd BW tertiles: 28.3 vs. 28.9 vs. 29.0 ml/kg; BSA tertiles: 1,696 vs. 1,935 vs. 2,086 ml/1.73).
CONCLUSIONS: In CAPD anuric patients VOL(in) prescription could be tailored to body mass to reach the minimum depuration target. Normalized VOL(in) might be prescribed in slightly higher doses (from 27 to 30 ml/kg exchange) for patients with higher body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570073     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-014-0065-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  29 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Graham Woodrow; Simon Davies
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2011-05-06

3.  Peritoneal urea and creatinine clearances in continuous peritoneal dialysis patients with different types of peritoneal solute transport.

Authors:  A H Tzamaloukas; G H Murata; B Piraino; P Rao; J Bernardini; D Malhotra; D G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Impact of increasing dialysis volume on adequacy targets: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Harty; H Boulton; M Venning; R Gokal
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Are peritoneal dialysis patients with and without residual renal function equivalent for survival study? Insight from a retrospective review of the cause of death.

Authors:  Cheuk-Chun Szeto; Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong; Kai-Ming Chow; Chi-Bon Leung; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Peritoneal dialysis fill volume: can the patient tell the difference?

Authors:  K P Harris; A M Keogh; L Alderson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  P E Watson; I D Watson; R D Batt
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Measurement of total body water and urea kinetic modelling in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  G Woodrow; B Oldroyd; J H Turney; P S Davies; J M Day; M A Smith
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.975

9.  Impact of fill volume on peritoneal clearances and cytokine appearance in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ramón Paniagua; María de Jesús Ventura; Ernesto Rodríguez; Juana Sil; Teresa Galindo; María Elena Hurtado; Guadalupe Alcántara; Amado Chimalpopoca; Isabel González; Abraham Sanjurjo; Lourdes Barrón; Dante Amato; Salim Mujais
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Increased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. The Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.

Authors:  D N Churchill; K E Thorpe; K D Nolph; P R Keshaviah; D G Oreopoulos; D Pagé
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.