INTRODUCTION: Cardiac valve calcification (CVC) has long been regarded as a consequence of abnormal calcium-phosphate metabolism in uremic patient associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in this population. We evaluated the association between residual renal function (RRF), phosphate level and valve calcification in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We studied 30 stable PD patients (60 % males; mean age 57 ± 12.36 years) and 34 HD patients (58.8 % males; mean age 50.8 ± 10.4 years) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) from 6 up to 36 months. The presence of CVC was assessed by standard bi-dimensional echocardiography. RRF was calculated by standard technique. RESULTS: Valve calcification was more frequently found in HD compared to PD patients (70.6 vs 29.4 %, p = 0.007). Significantly lower phosphate [1.38 ± 0.41 versus 1.99 ± 0.35 mmol/L (p < 0.0001)], a higher RRF [4.09 ± 2.09 ml/min vs 0.62 ± 0.89 ml/min (p < 0.0001)], and older age [57 ± 12.36 years vs 50.8 ± 10.4 years (p = 0.033)] were observed in PD as compared to HD patients. The logistic regression analysis for the presence of valve calcification when adjusted for age and diabetes, with type of therapy, serum phosphate, RRF, CRP, and serum albumin as variables in the model, revealed significant association between the presence of valve calcification and age and RRF. The correlation between phosphate levels and RRF was even stronger in PD patients than in HD patients (r = -0.704; p = 0.0001) vs (r = -0.502; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the residual renal function in PD patients contributes significantly to the maintenance of phosphate balance and may explain the lower prevalence of valve calcification in PD patients compared with HD patients in the period up to first 3 years under renal replacement therapy.
INTRODUCTION:Cardiac valve calcification (CVC) has long been regarded as a consequence of abnormal calcium-phosphate metabolism in uremic patient associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in this population. We evaluated the association between residual renal function (RRF), phosphate level and valve calcification in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We studied 30 stable PDpatients (60 % males; mean age 57 ± 12.36 years) and 34 HDpatients (58.8 % males; mean age 50.8 ± 10.4 years) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) from 6 up to 36 months. The presence of CVC was assessed by standard bi-dimensional echocardiography. RRF was calculated by standard technique. RESULTS:Valve calcification was more frequently found in HD compared to PDpatients (70.6 vs 29.4 %, p = 0.007). Significantly lower phosphate [1.38 ± 0.41 versus 1.99 ± 0.35 mmol/L (p < 0.0001)], a higher RRF [4.09 ± 2.09 ml/min vs 0.62 ± 0.89 ml/min (p < 0.0001)], and older age [57 ± 12.36 years vs 50.8 ± 10.4 years (p = 0.033)] were observed in PD as compared to HDpatients. The logistic regression analysis for the presence of valve calcification when adjusted for age and diabetes, with type of therapy, serum phosphate, RRF, CRP, and serum albumin as variables in the model, revealed significant association between the presence of valve calcification and age and RRF. The correlation between phosphate levels and RRF was even stronger in PDpatients than in HDpatients (r = -0.704; p = 0.0001) vs (r = -0.502; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the residual renal function in PDpatients contributes significantly to the maintenance of phosphate balance and may explain the lower prevalence of valve calcification in PDpatients compared with HDpatients in the period up to first 3 years under renal replacement therapy.
Authors: E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Muriel P C Grooteman; Albert H A Mazairac; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Menso J Nubé; Michiel L Bots; Renée Lévesque; Piet M ter Wee; Peter J Blankestijn Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Markus Ketteler; Ralf Westenfeld; Georg Schlieper; Vincent Brandenburg; Jürgen Floege Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Juan C Ramirez-Sandoval; Ivan Casanova; Alejandro Villar; F Enrique Gomez; Cristino Cruz; Ricardo Correa-Rotter Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Vidhya Parameswaran; Linda H Ficociello; Ludmila Anderson; Norma J Ofsthun; Christopher Kwoh; Claudy Mullon; Robert J Kossmann; Daniel W Coyne Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Thijs T Jansz; Franka E van Reekum; Akin Özyilmaz; Pim A de Jong; Franciscus T J Boereboom; Tiny Hoekstra; Marianne C Verhaar; Brigit C van Jaarsveld Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Tabo Sikaneta; George Wu; Mohamed Abdolell; Anita Ng; Sara Mahdavi; Anton Svendrovski; Tony Tu; Trish Mercer; Matthew Tong; Dimitrios Oreopoulos; Paul Tam Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 1.756