Literature DB >> 24997610

Individual and work-unit measures of psychological demands and decision latitude and the use of antihypertensive medication.

S Daugaard1, J H Andersen, M B Grynderup, Z A Stokholm, R Rugulies, Å M Hansen, A Kærgaard, S Mikkelsen, J P Bonde, J F Thomsen, K L Christensen, H A Kolstad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyse whether psychological demands and decision latitude measured on individual and work-unit level were related to prescription of antihypertensive medication.
METHODS: A total of 3,421 women and 897 men within 388 small work units completed a questionnaire concerning psychological working conditions according to the job strain model. Mean levels of psychological demands and decision latitude were computed for each work unit to obtain exposure measures that were less influenced by reporting bias. Dispensed antihypertensive medication prescriptions were identified in The Danish National Prescription Registry. Odds ratios (OR) comparing the highest and lowest third of the population at individual and work-unit level, respectively, were estimated by multilevel logistic regression adjusted for confounders. Psychological demands and decision latitude were tested for interaction. Supplementary analyses of 21 months follow-up were conducted.
RESULTS: Among women, increasing psychological demands at individual (adjusted OR 1.54; 95 % CI 1.02-2.33) and work-unit level (adjusted OR 1.41; 95 % CI 1.04-1.90) was significantly associated with purchase of antihypertensive medication. No significant association was found for decision latitude. Follow-up results supported an association with psychological demands but they were not significant. All results for men showed no association. Psychological demands and decision latitude did not interact.
CONCLUSION: High psychological work demands were associated with the purchase of prescribed antihypertensive medication among women. This effect was present on both the work-unit and the individual level. Among men there were no associations. The lack of interaction between psychological demands and decision latitude did not support the job strain model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24997610     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-014-0958-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  49 in total

1.  Job strain and blood pressure in African Americans: the Pitt County Study.

Authors:  A B Curtis; S A James; T E Raghunathan; K H Alcser
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  THE CAUSE OF HYPERPIESIA: PRESENTATION OF A HYPOTHESIS.

Authors:  C P Donnison
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1934-04-21

3.  Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure profiles.

Authors:  T Theorell; U de Faire; J Johnson; E Hall; A Perski; W Stewart
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Do early life exposures explain associations in mid-adulthood between workplace factors and risk factors for cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Claudia Thomas; Chris Power
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data.

Authors:  Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 15-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Psychosocial work characteristics and perceived control in relation to cardiovascular rewind at night.

Authors:  R Rau; A Georgiades; M Fredrikson; C Lemne; U de Faire
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07

Review 7.  Work-related stress and blood pressure: current theoretical models and considerations from a behavioral medicine perspective.

Authors:  J E Schwartz; T G Pickering; P A Landsbergis
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-07

8.  Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men.

Authors:  R Karasek; D Baker; F Marxer; A Ahlbom; T Theorell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Work-unit measures of organisational justice and risk of depression--a 2-year cohort study.

Authors:  Matias Brødsgaard Grynderup; Ole Mors; Åse Marie Hansen; Johan Hviid Andersen; Jens Peter Bonde; Anette Kærgaard; Linda Kærlev; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Reiner Rugulies; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Henrik Albert Kolstad
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  The influence of low job control on ambulatory blood pressure and perceived stress over the working day in men and women from the Whitehall II cohort.

Authors:  Andrew Steptoe; Gonneke Willemsen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of perceived job insecurity with ischemic heart disease and antihypertensive medication in the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study 1990-2010.

Authors:  Ute Latza; Karin Rossnagel; Harald Hannerz; Hermann Burr; Sylvia Jankowiak; Eva-Maria Backé
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Psychosocial job strain and polypharmacy: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Edwin Ck Tan; Kuan-Yu Pan; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Johan Fastbom; Hugo Westerlund; Hui-Xin Wang
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Psychosocial work factors and blood pressure among 63 800 employees from The Netherlands in the Lifelines Cohort Study.

Authors:  Md Omar Faruque; Elisabeth Framke; Jeppe Karl Sørensen; Ida Elisabeth Huitfeldt Madsen; Reiner Rugulies; Judith M Vonk; H Marike Boezen; Ute Bültmann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.710

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.