Literature DB >> 10527293

Clinical and economic assessment of the omeprazole test in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

R Fass1, J J Ofman, I M Gralnek, C Johnson, E Camargo, R E Sampliner, M B Fennerty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a trial of a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (the omeprazole test) in detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with heartburn symptoms.
DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. PATIENTS AND
SETTING: Forty-three consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were enrolled at a Veterans Affairs medical center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom response to the omeprazole test vs placebo in GERD-positive and GERD-negative patients; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the omeprazole test; and cost per correct diagnosis achieved with the omeprazole test compared with traditional diagnostic strategies.
RESULTS: Of 42 patients (98%) who completed the study, 35 (83%) were classified as GERD positive and 7 (17%) as GERD negative. Twenty-eight GERD-positive and 3 GERD-negative patients responded to the omeprazole test, providing a sensitivity of 80.0% (95% confidence interval, 66.7%-93.3%) and a specificity of 57.1% (95% confidence interval, 20.5%-93.8%). Economic analysis revealed that the omeprazole test saves $348 per average patient evaluated, and results in a 64% reduction in the number of upper endoscopies performed and a 53% reduction in the use of pH testing.
CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole test is sensitive and fairly specific for diagnosing GERD in patients with typical GERD symptoms. This strategy could result in significant cost savings and decreased use of invasive diagnostic tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527293     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.159.18.2161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  34 in total

Review 1.  Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain.

Authors:  R Fass; G Tougas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Endoscopy-negative reflux disease.

Authors:  J P Galmiche; S B des Varannes
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes.

Authors:  P Bytzer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Diagnostic value of potent acid inhibition in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Joan Monés
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease.

Authors:  Joachim Labenz; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: role of proton pump inhibitor test and upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  M A Bianco; G Rotondano; A Prisco; C Meucci; L Cipolletta
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and reflux esophagitis are all distinct conditions--a debate: pro.

Authors:  Tomás Navarro-Rodriguez; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs.

Authors:  J Dent; D Armstrong; B Delaney; P Moayyedi; N J Talley; N Vakil
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Diagnostic utility of reflux disease symptoms.

Authors:  M Shaw
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Current perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of functional esophageal disorders.

Authors:  Roy Dekel; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.