Literature DB >> 15185032

Liver metastases in cancer: detection with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

J Hohmann1, T Albrecht, A Oldenburg, J Skrok, K-J Wolf.   

Abstract

In patients with known or suspected malignancy, ultrasonography (US) is often the first choice for liver imaging because of its widespread availability and low cost. Compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the sensitivity of conventional US for detecting hepatic metastases is relatively poor. The advent of microbubble contrast agents changed this situation. Sensitivity and specificity increased substantially with the use of these contrast agents and contrast-specific imaging modes in recent years. Currently, numerous US imaging methods exist, based on Doppler techniques or harmonic imaging. They exploit the complex nonlinear behavior of microbubbles in a sound field to achieve marked augmentation of the US signal. Although microbubble contrast agents are essentially blood pool agents, some have a hepatosplenic specific late phase. Imaging during this late phase is particularly useful for improving the detection of malignant liver lesions and allows US to perform similarly to spiral CT as shown by recent studies. In addition, this late phase imaging is very helpful for lesion characterization. Low mechanical index imaging with the newer perfluor agents permits real-time imaging of the dynamic contrast behavior during the arterial, portal venous, and late phases and is particularly helpful for lesion characterization. The use of US for hemodynamic studies of the liver transit time may detect blood flow changes induced by micrometastases even before they become visible on imaging. In this field of functional imaging, further research is required to achieve conclusive results, which are not yet available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15185032     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-004-0175-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  10 in total

1.  Standardize and compare contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic digital images obtained with different technologies: how to overcome the subjectivity.

Authors:  Mirko D'Onofrio; Niccolò Faccioli; Roberto Malagò; Giulia Zamboni; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 3.  Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Hektor Grazhdani; Cristina Fioravanti; Maria Rosignuolo; Fabrizio Calliada; Daniela Messineo; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Adriano Redler; Carlo Catalano; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Morphological and dynamic evaluation of complex cystic focal liver lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: current state of the art.

Authors:  Antonio Corvino; Fabio Sandomenico; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Fabio Corvino; Domenico Tafuri; Orlando Catalano
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-05-13

5.  Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Wolfgang Kratzer; Deike Strobe; Etienne Danse; Robert Fessl; Alfred Bunk; Udo Vossas; Karlheinz Hauenstein; Wilhelm Koch; Wolfgang Blank; Matthijs Oudkerk; Dietbert Hahn; Christian Greis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Microbubbles assist goat liver ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Xionglin Fan; Shuhua Xiong; Kai Hu; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Evaluation of quantitative contrast harmonic imaging to assess malignancy of liver tumors: a prospective controlled two-center study.

Authors:  E M Jung; D A Clevert; A G Schreyer; S Schmitt; J Rennert; R Kubale; S Feuerbach; F Jung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Detection of focal liver lesions: from the subjectivity of conventional ultrasound to the objectivity of volume ultrasound.

Authors:  F Vecchiato; M D'Onofrio; R Malagò; E Martone; A Gallotti; N Faccioli; V Cantisani; C Marigliano; A Ruzzenente; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Comparison of digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessment of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Ronggui Liu; Zhimei Yan; Guijun Zhang; Zhaoyan Ding; Yunping Li; Zhirong Jiang
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 10.  Morphologic and Functional Imaging of Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Philipp Heusch; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2015-11-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.