Literature DB >> 1518465

Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques.

I A Cunningham1, B K Reid.   

Abstract

The modulation transfer function (MTF) of an idealized imaging system can be determined from the Fourier transform of the system's line-spread function (LSF). Three techniques of experimentally determining the LSF require imaging either a slit, wire, or edge. In this paper, these three techniques are modeled theoretically to determine the noise in the calculated MTFs as a function of spatial frequency resulting from both quantum fluctuations and stochastic detector noise. The techniques are compared using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the MTF, defined as the ratio of the MTF value to the standard deviation in an ensemble of MTF determinations from independent measurements. It is shown that for a specified photon fluence, the edge method MTF has the highest SNR at low spatial frequencies, while that of the slit method is superior at high frequencies. The wire method SNR is always inferior to that of the slit technique. This suggests that the edge method is preferable for measuring parameters such as the low-frequency drop, and the slit method is preferable for determining high-frequency response. The cross-over frequency at which the slit and edge methods are equal (f(e)) for quantum-noise limited systems is a function of the slit width and the length over which the LSF is measured. For detector-noise limited systems, f(e) is dependent on the slit width only. The SNR in all but the quantum-noise limited slit method can therefore be increased by decreasing the length over which the LSF is measured, smoothing the tails of the LSF, or by fitting the tails to an analytic expression.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1518465     DOI: 10.1118/1.596821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-03-23

2.  Determining the MTF of medical imaging displays using edge techniques.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Hans Roehrig; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Jiahua Fan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Modeling and measurement of the detector presampling MTF of a variable resolution x-ray CT scanner.

Authors:  Roman Melnyk; Frank A DiBianca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer modeling of the spatial resolution properties of a dedicated breast CT system.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method.

Authors:  Ryo Higashide; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Hiroshi Kunitomo; Kazuya Ohashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-06-19

7.  Cascaded systems analysis of photon counting detectors.

Authors:  J Xu; W Zbijewski; G Gang; J W Stayman; K Taguchi; M Lundqvist; E Fredenberg; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Resolution characterization of a silicon-based, photon-counting computed tomography prototype capable of patient scanning.

Authors:  Joakim da Silva; Fredrik Grönberg; Björn Cederström; Mats Persson; Martin Sjölin; Zlatan Alagic; Robert Bujila; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-15

9.  Dual-energy attenuation coefficient decomposition with differential filtration and application to a microCT scanner.

Authors:  R Taschereau; R W Silverman; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Estimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects.

Authors:  Jered R Wells; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.