Literature DB >> 15182986

Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones.

Paul F Heini1, Torsten Franz, Christoph Fankhauser, Beat Gasser, R Ganz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of polymethyl-methacrylate injection into the osteoporotic proximal femur and its effect on the mechanical properties.
DESIGN: In vitro pairwise comparison of non reinforced and reinforced bones in a load to failure loading mode.
BACKGROUND: Hip fractures represent an important public healthcare problem. Continued growth in the elderly population will raise the incidence of hip fractures and their associated costs dramatically in the near future.
METHODS: Twenty pairs of osteoporotic femurs were mechanically tested either in a single-limb stance configuration or simulating a fall on the greater trochanter. From each pair, one femur was augmented with bone cement, with the contralateral femur serving as a control. The surface temperature at the femoral neck was recorded until twenty minutes after injection. The fracture load and the energy absorption were calculated. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test for differences in fracture load and energy absorption between the reinforced femurs and the native controls.
RESULTS: Volumes of 28-41 ml of cement (mean, 36 ml) could be injected. The increase of surface temperature at the femoral neck ranged from delta18.4 to delta29.8 degrees C. For the single limb stance configurations, the peak fracture load was increased by 21%, (P < 0.002) and for the simulated fall on the hip by 82%, (P < 0.002). The corresponding values for energy absorption were +48%; and +188% (P < 0.002) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility and mechanical effectiveness of the in vitro procedure could be demonstrated. The heat generation due to polymethyl-methacrylate polymerisation is high. RELEVANCE: Prophylactic reinforcement of the femur could become a treatment option to solve the problems with osteoporotic hip fractures in patients at risk. Reinforcement materials with less exothermic reaction need to be evaluated further and also the feasibility of fracture repair after reinforcement. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15182986     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  34 in total

1.  Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: a combined evolutionary optimization and particle diffusion model approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  Enhancement of holding strength of cannulated screw supported with PMMA: a biomechanical study on femoral head [corrected].

Authors:  Reşad Zeynalov; İsmail Ağır; Ahmet Hamdi Akgülle; Barış Kocaoğlu; Mithat Selim Yalçın
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-12

5.  Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Jorn Op Den Buijs; Sean McEligot; Yifei Dai; Rachel C Entwistle; Christina Salas; L Joseph Melton; Kevin E Bennet; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Bone texture analysis of human femurs using a new device (BMA™) improves failure load prediction.

Authors:  S Kolta; S Paratte; T Amphoux; S Persohn; S Campana; W Skalli; S Paternotte; J-N Argenson; J-M Bouler; O Gagey; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Percutaneous long bone cementoplasty of the limbs: experience with fifty-one non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Xavier Buy; Omer Eker; Thierry Fabre; Jean Palussiere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Patient-specific finite element modeling for femoral bone augmentation.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Robert S Armiger; Michael D Kutzer; Stephen M Belkoff; Simon C Mears; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Comparison of percutaneous long bone cementoplasty with or without embedding a cement-filled catheter for painful long bone metastases with impending fracture.

Authors:  Xun-Wei Liu; Peng Jin; Kai Liu; Hao Chen; Li Li; Min Li; Hai Tang; Gang Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Acrylic bone cement: current concept review.

Authors:  B Magnan; M Bondi; T Maluta; E Samaila; L Schirru; C Dall'Oca
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.