Literature DB >> 15175414

Gene expression, synteny, and local similarity in human noncoding mutation rates.

Matthew T Webster1, Nick G C Smith, Martin J Lercher, Hans Ellegren.   

Abstract

The human genome is organized with regard to many features such as isochores, Giemsa bands, clusters of genes with similar expression patterns, and contiguous regions with shared evolutionary histories (synteny blocks). In addition to these genomic features, it is clear that mutation rates also vary across the human genome. To address how mutation rates and genomic features are related, we analyzed substitution rates at three classes of putatively neutral noncoding sites (nongenic, intronic, and ancestral repeats) in approximately 14 Mb of human-chimpanzee alignments covering human chromosome 7. Patterns of mutation rate variation inferred from substitution rate variation differ among the three site classes. In particular, we find that intronic mutation rates are strongly affected by the breadth of expression of the genes in which they reside, with broadly expressed genes exhibiting low mutation rates, probably as a consequence of the transcription-coupled repair process acting in the germ line. All site classes show significant local similarities in mutation rate at the megabase scale, and regional similarities in nongenic mutation rate covary with blocks of synteny between the human and mouse genomes, indicating that the evolutionary history of a genomic region is an important determinant of mutation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175414     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  17 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; David W Burt; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A population-based LD map of the human chromosome 6p.

Authors:  Hong Xiang Yu; Jer-Ming Chia; Guillaume Bourque; Marie Vivien Wong; Soh Ha Chan; Ee Chee Ren
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  The scale of mutational variation in the murid genome.

Authors:  Daniel J Gaffney; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Variable molecular clocks in hominoids.

Authors:  Navin Elango; James W Thomas; Soojin V Yi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Megan Woolfit; Ted Phelps
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Intronic AT skew is a defendable proxy for germline transcription but does not predict crossing-over or protein evolution rates in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Claudia C Weber; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Understanding what determines the frequency and pattern of human germline mutations.

Authors:  Norman Arnheim; Peter Calabrese
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  A genome-wide view of mutation rate co-variation using multivariate analyses.

Authors:  Guruprasad Ananda; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Significant selective constraint at 4-fold degenerate sites in the avian genome and its consequence for detection of positive selection.

Authors:  Axel Künstner; Benoit Nabholz; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.