Literature DB >> 15173111

Comparative genomic hybridization provides new insights into the molecular taxonomy of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex.

Laura C Edwards-Ingram1, Manda E Gent, David C Hoyle, Andrew Hayes, Lubomira I Stateva, Stephen G Oliver.   

Abstract

The science of taxonomy is constantly improving as new techniques are developed. Current practice is to construct phylogenetic trees based on the analysis of the DNA sequence of single genes, or parts of single genes. However, this approach has recently been brought into question as several tree topologies may be produced for the same clade when the sequences for various different genes are used. The availability of complete genome sequences for several organisms has seen the adoption of microarray technology to construct molecular phylogenies of bacteria, based on all of the genes. Similar techniques have been used to reveal the relationships between different strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have exploited microarray technology to construct a molecular phylogeny for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex of yeast species, which is based on all of the protein-encoding genes revealed by the complete genome sequence of the paradigmatic species, S. cerevisiae. We also analyze different strains of S. cerevisiae itself, as well as the putative species S. boulardii. We show that in addition to the phylogeny produced, we can identify and analyze individual ORF traits and interpret the results to give a detailed explanation of evolutionary events underlying the phylogeny. Copyright 2004 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15173111      PMCID: PMC419782          DOI: 10.1101/gr.2114704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  52 in total

1.  A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history.

Authors:  Vincent Daubin; Manolo Gouy; Guy Perrière
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR.

Authors:  C Huxley; E D Green; I Dunham
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Engineering evolution to study speciation in yeasts.

Authors:  Daniela Delneri; Isabelle Colson; Sofia Grammenoudi; Ian N Roberts; Edward J Louis; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Whole genome comparison of Campylobacter jejuni human isolates using a low-cost microarray reveals extensive genetic diversity.

Authors:  N Dorrell; J A Mangan; K G Laing; J Hinds; D Linton; H Al-Ghusein; B G Barrell; J Parkhill; N G Stoker; A V Karlyshev; P D Butcher; B W Wren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Filamentous growth in budding yeast.

Authors:  S J Kron
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Tools for the study of genome rearrangements in laboratory and industrial yeast strains.

Authors:  Lesley Lockhart; Stephen G Oliver; Daniela Delneri
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2002-03-30       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 7.  Life with 6000 genes.

Authors:  A Goffeau; B G Barrell; H Bussey; R W Davis; B Dujon; H Feldmann; F Galibert; J D Hoheisel; C Jacq; M Johnston; E J Louis; H W Mewes; Y Murakami; P Philippsen; H Tettelin; S G Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A physical comparison of chromosome III in six strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B L Wicksteed; I Collins; A Dershowitz; L I Stateva; R P Green; S G Oliver; A J Brown; C S Newlon
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C.

Authors:  F Winston; C Dollard; S L Ricupero-Hovasse
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 10.  Yeast: an experimental organism for modern biology.

Authors:  D Botstein; G R Fink
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  26 in total

1.  Array Comparative Genomic Hybridizations: assessing the ability to recapture evolutionary relationships using an in silico approach.

Authors:  Luz B Gilbert; Lee Chae; Takao Kasuga; John W Taylor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Validation of mixed-genome microarrays as a method for genetic discrimination.

Authors:  Yan Wan; Shira L Broschat; Douglas R Call
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparative genome analysis across a kingdom of eukaryotic organisms: specialization and diversification in the fungi.

Authors:  Michael J Cornell; Intikhab Alam; Darren M Soanes; Han Min Wong; Cornelia Hedeler; Norman W Paton; Magnus Rattray; Simon J Hubbard; Nicholas J Talbot; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Alternative splicing of PTC7 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae determines protein localization.

Authors:  Kara Juneau; Corey Nislow; Ronald W Davis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Novel insights in genetic transformation of the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii.

Authors:  Bruno Douradinha; Viviane C B Reis; Matthew B Rogers; Fernando A G Torres; Jared D Evans; Ernesto T A Marques
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.269

6.  Using comparative genomic hybridization to survey genomic sequence divergence across species: a proof-of-concept from Drosophila.

Authors:  Suzy C P Renn; Heather E Machado; Albyn Jones; Kosha Soneji; Rob J Kulathinal; Hans A Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  A Systems Biology Interpretation of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Data through Phylogenetics.

Authors:  Ayman N Abunimer; Jose Salazar; David P Noursi; Mones S Abu-Asab
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2016-03

8.  A Mutation in PGM2 Causing Inefficient Galactose Metabolism in the Probiotic Yeast Saccharomyces boulardii.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Liu; Guo-Chang Zhang; In Iok Kong; Eun Ju Yun; Jia-Qi Zheng; Dae-Hyuk Kweon; Yong-Su Jin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genotypic and physiological characterization of Saccharomyces boulardii, the probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Laura Edwards-Ingram; Paul Gitsham; Nicola Burton; Geoff Warhurst; Ian Clarke; David Hoyle; Stephen G Oliver; Lubomira Stateva
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Evolutionary insights into scleractinian corals using comparative genomic hybridizations.

Authors:  Manuel Aranda; Michael K DeSalvo; Till Bayer; Monica Medina; Christian R Voolstra
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.