Literature DB >> 26983023

A Systems Biology Interpretation of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Data through Phylogenetics.

Ayman N Abunimer1, Jose Salazar2, David P Noursi3, Mones S Abu-Asab4.   

Abstract

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) is a rapid screening technique to detect gene deletions and duplications, providing an overview of chromosomal aberrations throughout the entire genome of a tumor, without the need for cell culturing. However, the heterogeneity of aCGH data obfuscates existing methods of data analysis. Analysis of aCGH data from a systems biology perspective or in the context of total aberrations is largely absent in the published literature. We present here a novel alternative to the functional analysis of aCGH data using the phylogenetic paradigm that is well-suited to high dimensional datasets of heterogeneous nature, but has not been widely adapted to aCGH data. Maximum parsimony phylogenetic analysis sorts out genetic data through the simplest presentation of the data on a cladogram, a graphical evolutionary tree, thus providing a powerful and efficient method for aCGH data analysis. For example, the cladogram models the multiphasic changes in the cancer genome and identifies shared early mutations in the disease progression, providing a simple yet powerful means of aCGH data interpretation. As such, applying maximum parsimony phylogenetic analysis to aCGH results allows for the differentiation between drivers and passenger genes aberrations in cancer specimens. In addition to offering a novel methodology to analyze aCGH results, we present here a crucial software suite that we wrote to carry out the analysis. In a broader context, we wish to underscore that phylogenetic analysis of aCGH data is a non-parametric method that circumvents the pitfalls and frustrations of standard analytical techniques that rely on parametric statistics. Organizing the data in a cladogram as explained in this research article provides insights into the disease common aberrations, as well as the disease subtypes and their shared aberrations (the synapomorphies) of each subtype. Hence, we report the method and make the software suite publicly and freely available at http://software.phylomcs.com so that researchers can test alternative and innovative approaches to the analysis of aCGH data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26983023      PMCID: PMC4799695          DOI: 10.1089/omi.2015.0184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  21 in total

Review 1.  Comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  M M Weiss; M A Hermsen; G A Meijer; N C van Grieken; J P Baak; E J Kuipers; P J van Diest
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Array Comparative Genomic Hybridizations: assessing the ability to recapture evolutionary relationships using an in silico approach.

Authors:  Luz B Gilbert; Lee Chae; Takao Kasuga; John W Taylor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Computational Tools for Parsimony Phylogenetic Analysis of Omics Data.

Authors:  Jose Salazar; Hakima Amri; David Noursi; Mones Abu-Asab
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2015-06-03

4.  Phyloproteomics: what phylogenetic analysis reveals about serum proteomics.

Authors:  Mones Abu-Asab; Mohamed Chaouchi; Hakima Amri
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Evolutionary medicine: A meaningful connection between omics, disease, and treatment.

Authors:  Mones Abu-Asab; Mohamed Chaouchi; Hakima Amri
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Preprocessing and downstream analysis of microarray DNA copy number profiles.

Authors:  Mark A van de Wiel; Franck Picard; Wessel N van Wieringen; Bauke Ylstra
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Biomarkers in the age of omics: time for a systems biology approach.

Authors:  Mones S Abu-Asab; Mohamed Chaouchi; Salvatore Alesci; Susana Galli; Majid Laassri; Amrita K Cheema; Fouad Atouf; John VanMeter; Hakima Amri
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2011-02-14

8.  Comparative genomic hybridization provides new insights into the molecular taxonomy of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex.

Authors:  Laura C Edwards-Ingram; Manda E Gent; David C Hoyle; Andrew Hayes; Lubomira I Stateva; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Array CGH phylogeny: how accurate are comparative genomic hybridization-based trees?

Authors:  Luz B Gilbert; Takao Kasuga; N Louise Glass; John W Taylor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Systems Biology Profiling of AMD on the Basis of Gene Expression.

Authors:  Mones S Abu-Asab; Jose Salazar; Jingsheng Tuo; Chi-Chao Chan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  2 in total

1.  Continuous crossbreeding of sake yeasts using growth selection systems for a-type and α-type cells.

Authors:  Nobuo Fukuda; Misato Kaishima; Jun Ishii; Akihiko Kondo; Shinya Honda
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 2.  4q21.2q21.3 Duplication: Molecular and Neuropsychological Aspects.

Authors:  Ivan Y Iourov; Maria A Zelenova; Svetlana G Vorsanova; Victoria V Voinova; Yuri B Yurov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.