Literature DB >> 15172872

Transvaginal hysterectomy: rationale and surgical approach.

S Robert Kovac1.   

Abstract

Abdominal hysterectomy is performed in the United States at a 3:1 ratio over vaginal hysterectomy, despite evidence that vaginal hysterectomy offers advantages over abdominal hysterectomy with regard to operative time, complication rates, recovery, return to daily activities, and overall costs of treatment. In fact, the predominance of the abdominal approach may be based on factors other than clinical considerations, including resident training, use of limited or obsolete guidelines, greater third-party compensation for abdominal procedures, a presumption rather than a confirmation that pathology exists that contraindicates a vaginal approach, and misconceptions about the safety and cost of vaginal hysterectomy. A number of studies spanning several years demonstrate that the use of more systematic guidelines for selecting the route of hysterectomy results in a major shift toward the vaginal approach. Evidence also shows that transvaginal hysterectomy is both feasible and optimum for types of patients who have long been considered inappropriate candidates for the vaginal route. New instrumentation facilitates the vaginal approach and contributes to improved hemostasis and decreased operative time. Included here is a step-by-step approach to determining appropriate candidates for the vaginal approach via assessment of access, uterus size, and extent of pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172872     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124570.95087.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.

Authors:  Whitney Trotter Ross; Melanie R Meister; Jonathan P Shepherd; Margaret A Olsen; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Regional Performance of Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Is the Role of Surgeon Training?

Authors:  Jessica G Putman; Melanie R Meister; Stacy M Lenger; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.913

3.  Hysterectomy at a Canadian tertiary care facility: results of a one year retrospective review.

Authors:  Alina Toma; Wilma M Hopman; R Hugh Gorwill
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database.

Authors:  Terrence M Fullum; Joseph A Ladapo; Bijan J Borah; Candace L Gunnarsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.