Literature DB >> 32701766

Regional Performance of Apical Support Procedures at Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Is the Role of Surgeon Training?

Jessica G Putman1, Melanie R Meister2, Stacy M Lenger3, Jerry L Lowder3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with performance of concomitant apical support procedures (ASPs) with benign hysterectomy at a regional medical system.
METHODS: Benign hysterectomies performed within 1 regional medical system from January 2011 to November 2017 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and 10th Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Primary outcome was performance of concomitant ASP. χ2 Tests compared categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with performance of concomitant ASP.
RESULTS: A total of 12,345 benign hysterectomies were performed during the study period. Uterovaginal prolapse was the primary diagnosis in 924 (7.48%) hysterectomies and an associated diagnosis in 1180 (9.56%) hysterectomies. A total of 686 patients (5.56%) had concurrent ASPs: 119 (17.3%) in patients without a diagnosis of prolapse and 567 (82.7%) with prolapse. Using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, race, insurance type, hospital type, procedure year, hysterectomy route, and surgeon training in patients with a diagnosis of prolapse, older age, supracervical hysterectomy, and surgeon training were associated with performance of ASPs.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of uterovaginal prolapse, ASPs are not routinely performed at time of hysterectomy. Fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to perform ASPs. Ongoing educational efforts during training and postgraduate at the national and regional level on the importance of reestablishing apical vaginal support at time of hysterectomy is needed to prevent incident and recurrent post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
Copyright © 2020 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32701766      PMCID: PMC8130707          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   1.913


  23 in total

1.  Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.

Authors:  Whitney Trotter Ross; Melanie R Meister; Jonathan P Shepherd; Margaret A Olsen; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Uterine prolapse.

Authors:  Anjum Doshani; Roderick E C Teo; Christopher J Mayne; Douglas G Tincello
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 85: Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Fabio Ghezzi; Andrea Mariani; Antonella Cromi; Giorgio Bogani; Maurizio Serati; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Randomized comparison of three surgical methods used at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to prevent posterior enterocele.

Authors:  S H Cruikshank; S R Kovac
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.

Authors:  S R Kovac
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andreas du Bois; Justine Rochon; Jacobus Pfisterer; William J Hoskins
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Marcello Ceccaroni; Antonella Cromi; Mario Malzoni; Roberto Berretta; Pierandrea De Iaco; Giovanni Roviglione; Giorgio Bogani; Luca Minelli; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support.

Authors:  Karyn S Eilber; Marianna Alperin; Aqsa Khan; Ning Wu; Chris L Pashos; J Quentin Clemens; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Mario Malzoni; Antonella Cromi; Renato Seracchioli; Giuseppe Ciravolo; Francesco Fanfani; Fevzi Shakir; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Francesco Legge; Roberto Berretta; Giacomo Corrado; Lucia Casarella; Paolo Donarini; Margherita Zanello; Emanuele Perrone; Baldo Gisone; Enrico Vizza; Giovanni Scambia; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.