Literature DB >> 15170517

Open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy: is there any difference? Results of a prospective randomised study.

A Arroyo1, F Pérez, E Miranda, P Serrano, F Candela, J Lacueva, H Hernández, R Calpena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nowadays there is still controversy as to whether open or closed haemorrhoidectomy is the surgical treatment of choice for haemorrhoidal pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a randomised prospective study in the Day Surgery Unit comparing 100 patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (group A) versus 100 patients undergoing Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (group B) for symptomatic haemorrhoids, in whom medical treatment or rubber band ligation had failed.
RESULTS: Characteristics of the population were: mean age 43.5 years, with predominance of males, 123 vs. 77; 88% ASA I-II. CLINICAL
PRESENTATION: 95% rectal bleeding; 87.5% third-fourth degree. The anaesthetic technique of choice was local anaesthesia plus sedation in 180 patients (90%). Length of surgery: 24 min (group A) and 30 min (group B) (p=n.s.). Resection of three haemorrhoidal cushions was done in 87.5% of cases. There were no re-operations or re-admissions after discharge. Symptomatic recurrence, stenosis and incontinence were not found during the follow-up of the first year. Postoperative pain during the first postoperative week was greater in the open haemorrhoidectomy group, but the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) only during bowel movements. There was complete healing in 40% of the patients in group A and 90% of those in group B (p<0.05) after 1 month. After 1 year, the results and complications were similar in both groups (p=n.s.).
CONCLUSIONS: Closed haemorrhoidectomy gives better results in terms of pain and healing than open haemorrhoidectomy, whereas recurrence and complications are similar after 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15170517     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-003-0573-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Randomized trial of open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  E A Carapeti; M A Kamm; P J McDonald; S J Chadwick; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Randomized clinical trial of haemorrhoidectomy under a mixture of local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia.

Authors:  K S Ho; K W Eu; S M Heah; F Seow-Choen; Y W Chan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Closed hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  J A FERGUSON; J R HEATON
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1959 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Evidence-based practice in haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; R K Phillips
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Closed hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia.

Authors:  I T Khubchandani; H D Trimpi; J A Sheets
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1972-12

6.  Comparison of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K W Eu; F Seow-Choen; H S Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Hemorrhoidectomy vs. Lord's method: 17-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  J Konsten; C G Baeten
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy--is there any difference?

Authors:  G Arbman; H Krook; S Haapaniemi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Y H Ho; F Seow-Choen; M Tan; A F Leong
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M MacRae; R S McLeod
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Muhammad I Bhatti; Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Controversies in the treatment of common anal problems.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza-H Remzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Simona Giuratrabocchetta
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  B Vinson-Bonnet; T Higuero; J L Faucheron; A Senejoux; F Pigot; L Siproudhis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Antonio Arroyo; Francisco Pérez-Vicente; Elena Miranda; Ana Sánchez; Pilar Serrano; Fernando Candela; Israel Oliver; Rafael Calpena
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Literature review of the role of lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) when combined with excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Sameh Hany Emile; Mohamed Youssef; Hossam Elfeki; Waleed Thabet; Tito M Abd El-Hamed; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is still the gold standard treatment?

Authors:  Marco Milone; Paola Maietta; Maddalena Leongito; Giuseppe Pesce; Giuseppe Salvatore; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-04-10

8.  Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Y H Ho; P G Buettner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Tailored excisional treatment for high-grade haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  C Elbetti; I Giani; F M Consiglio; E Novelli; A Santini; J Martellucci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-10-11

10.  An evaluation of Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson procedures for haemorrhoidectomy at Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro, Hyderabad, Pakistan.

Authors:  Abdul Razaque Shaikh; Abdul Ghafoor Dalwani; Nasarullah Soomro
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.