Literature DB >> 9448627

Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy.

Y H Ho1, F Seow-Choen, M Tan, A F Leong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was a prospective randomized comparison of healing following open and closed haemorrhoidectomy.
METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients (mean(s.e.m.) age 45(1.7) years; 35 men, 32 women) with three prolapsed piles were randomized to open haemorrhoidectomy (n = 34) or closed haemorrhoidectomy (n = 33).
RESULTS: Mean(s.e.m.) follow-up was 8.7(0.2) months. There were no differences in the linear analogue pain scores, analgesic requirements and length of hospitalization after open haemorrhoidectomy and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Complete wound healing took significantly longer after closed haemorrhoidectomy (mean(s.e.m.) 6.9(0.7) weeks) compared with open haemorrhoidectomy (4.9(0.4)weeks) (P < 0.05). This was related to wound dehiscence in eight patients. Complication rates, however, were similar except for prolonged serous discharge from unhealed wounds. The anal manometry findings after both procedures were equivalent.
CONCLUSION: Open haemorrhoidectomy leads to faster and more reliable wound healing, although this did not result in less pain or fewer complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9448627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study.

Authors:  H-C Lin; D-L Ren; Q-L He; H Peng; S-K Xie; D Su; X-X Wang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  [Proctological diseases in routine urologic practice].

Authors:  J U Bock; J Jongen; H G Peleikis; S H Stübinger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Managing haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; John H Scholefield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-11

Review 4.  Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Muhammad I Bhatti; Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  [Haemorrhoidal suffering].

Authors:  G Pühse; F Raulf
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Comparison of clinical effects between warm water spray and sitz bath in post-hemorrhoidectomy period.

Authors:  Kuo-Feng Hsu; Jen-Shu Chia; Shu-Wen Jao; Chang-Chieh Wu; Hsiang-Yu Yang; Chen-Ming Mai; Chun-Yu Fu; Cheng-Wen Hsiao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage.

Authors:  Marc Singer; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

8.  Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Amy Halverson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

9.  Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K S Ho; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M Fareed; Saleh El-Awady; H Abd-El monaem; A Aly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.