Literature DB >> 15168676

Eugenics is alive and well: a survey of genetic professionals around the world.

D Wertz.   

Abstract

A survey of 2901 genetics professionals in 36 nations suggests that eugenic thought underlies their perceptions of the goals of genetics and that directiveness in counseling after prenatal diagnosis leads to individual decisions based on pessimistically biased information, especially in developing nations of Asia and Eastern Europe. The "non-directive counseling" found in English-speaking nations is an aberration from the rest of the world. Most geneticists, except in China, rejected government involvement in premarital testing or sterilization, but most also held a pessimistic view of persons with genetic disabilities. Individual, but not state-coerced, eugenics survives in much modern genetic practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 15168676     DOI: 10.1017/s0269889700003173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Context        ISSN: 0269-8897            Impact factor:   0.425


  8 in total

1.  Nondirectiveness and its lay interpretations: the effect of counseling style, ethnicity and culture on attitudes towards genetic counseling among Jewish and Bedouin respondents in Israel.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Marcela Atar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Information related to prenatal genetic counseling: interpretation by adolescents, effects on risk perception and ethical implications.

Authors:  Philippe A Melas; Susanne Georgsson Öhman; Niklas Juth; The-Hung Bui
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people.

Authors:  T S Petersen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Views on abortion: a comparison of female genetic counselors and women from the general population.

Authors:  Amelia R Woltanski; Ryan T Cragun; Melanie F Myers; Deborah L Cragun
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: a cross-cultural view.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Culture and acculturation influences on Palestinian perceptions of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Rawan Awwad; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Current attitudes and preconceptions towards expanded carrier screening in the Eastern Chinese reproductive-aged population.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Jianxin Tan; Binbin Shao; Tao Jiang; Ran Zhou; Yan Wang; Jingjing Zhang; Fengchang Qiao; Xiuqing Ji; Ya Wang; Ping Hu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Schizophrenia proteomics: biomarkers on the path to laboratory medicine?

Authors:  Shaheen Emmanuel Lakhan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 2.644

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.