Literature DB >> 15164271

Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: is it useful in clinical practice?

B Adamova1, S Vohanka, L Dusek.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Neurogenic claudication (NC) is typical of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). One suspected pathophysiological mechanism underlying NC is intermittent hypoxia of cauda equina fibres resulting from venous pooling, which may lead to ischaemic nerve conduction failure and to transient clinical and electrophysiological changes after exercise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appearance of significant transient electrophysiological abnormalities after walking exercise in patients with LSS and to establish the contribution of dynamic electrophysiological examination in the differential diagnostics of patients with LSS. The study participants were 36 consecutive patients with LSS demonstrated by computed tomography (CT). The control groups included, respectively, 28 patients with diabetes mellitus and clinically manifested polyneuropathy, and 32 healthy volunteers. The LSS patients were divided into four subgroups based on the clinical severity of the disease (with respect to the presence or absence of NC in the history and pareses on neurological examination). Soleus H-reflex, tibial F-wave and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to abductor hallucis muscle were examined in all groups, before and after quantified walking on a treadmill. The electrophysiological parameters measured after an exercise treadmill test (ETT) in LSS patients and in both control groups were compared with the same parameters obtained before ETT. The study shows that the electrophysiological parameters reveal minimal but statistically significant changes after walk loading in patients with LSS (a prolongation of the minimal latency of the tibial F-wave and of the latency of the soleus H-reflex). The changes in these parameters were demonstrated not only in patients with NC but also in patients without NC. More pronounced changes were found in LSS patients exhibiting chronic lower extremity pareses.
CONCLUSIONS: From among a large battery of electrophysiological tests, only the minimal latency of the tibial F-wave and the latency of the soleus H-reflex exhibit changes after walk loading in patients with LSS. These are minimal but statistically significant. Dynamic electrophysiological examination can illustrate the pathophysiology of NC in LSS, but from a practical point of view its contribution to the differential diagnostics of LSS or diabetic polyneuropathy is limited by an absence of established cut-off values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15164271      PMCID: PMC3476738          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0738-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Cauda equina dysfunction. The significance of two-level pathology.

Authors:  R W Porter; D Ward
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification.

Authors:  C C Arnoldi; A E Brodsky; J Cauchoix; H V Crock; G F Dommisse; M A Edgar; F P Gargano; R E Jacobson; W H Kirkaldy-Willis; A Kurihara; A Langenskiöld; I Macnab; G W McIvor; P H Newman; K W Paine; L A Russin; J Sheldon; M Tile; M R Urist; W E Wilson; L L Wiltse
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Dynamic F waves in neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  S F London; J D England
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Functional pathology of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  L Penning
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Recruitment curve of the soleus H reflex in patients with neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  P Pastor; J Valls-Sole
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients.

Authors:  S Hall; J D Bartleson; B M Onofrio; H L Baker; H Okazaki; J D O'Duffy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro.

Authors:  N Schönström; S Lindahl; J Willén; T Hansson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Myeloscopic study on lumbar spinal canal stenosis with special reference to intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Y Ooi; F Mita; Y Satoh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  H G Baramki; T Steffen; R Schondorf; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Micankova Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The nerve root sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective, consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Bin Liu; Wei Zhang; Yeqing Zhu; Limin Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2005.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical value of motor evoked potentials with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Shunsuke Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Yoshikazu Gembun; Gen Horiguchi; Hiromoto Ito
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Functional and quantitative magnetic resonance myelography of symptomatic stenoses of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Knut Eberhardt; Oliver Ganslandt; Andreas Stadlbauer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; M Schneider; B Marquardt; U Liljenqvist; T A Pietilä; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings.

Authors:  D Egli; O Hausmann; M Schmid; N Boos; V Dietz; A Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Can Foraminal Stenosis Due to Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Cause Axonopathy in the Lower Extremity?

Authors:  Seong Hyeon Jo; Jang Hyuk Cho; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28

10.  Evaluation of dynamic F wave parameters before and after physical activity in normal population.

Authors:  Saeid Khosrawi; Shila Haghighat; Hadi Hamedfar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-09-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.