Literature DB >> 17426910

Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings.

D Egli1, O Hausmann, M Schmid, N Boos, V Dietz, A Curt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between electrophysiological recordings and clinical as well as radiological findings in patients suggestive to suffer from a lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We hypothesise that the electrophysiological recordings, especially SSEP, indicate a lumbar nerve involvement that is complementary to the neurological examination and can provide confirmatory information in less obvious clinical cases. In a prospective cohort study, 54 patients scheduled for surgery due to LSS were enrolled in an unmasked, uncontrolled trial. All patients were assessed by neurological examination, electrophysiological recordings, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine. The electrophysiological recordings focused on spinal lumbar nerve involvement.
RESULTS: About 88% suffered from a multisegmental LSS and 91% of patients respectively complained of chronic lower back pain and/or leg pain for more than 3 months, combined with a restriction in walking distance. The neurological examination revealed only a few patients with sensory and/or motor deficits while 87% of patients showed pathological electrophysiological recordings (abnormal tibial SSEP in 78% of patients, abnormal H-reflex in 52% of patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the clinical examination, even in severe LSS, showed no specific sensory-motor deficit, the electrophysiological recordings indicated that the majority of patients had a neurogenic disorder within the lumbar spine. By the pattern of bilateral pathological tibial SSEP and pathological reflexes associated with normal peripheral nerve conduction, LSS can be separated from a demyelinating polyneuropathy and mono-radiculopathy. The applied electrophysiological recordings, especially SSEP, can confirm a neurogenic claudication due to cauda equina involvement and help to differentiate neurogenic from vascular claudication or musculo-skeletal disorders of the lower limbs. Therefore, electro-physiological recordings provide additional information to the neurological examination when the clinical relevance of a radiologically-suspected LSS needs to be confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426910     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-006-0427-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  51 in total

1.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  H G Baramki; T Steffen; R Schondorf; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing for the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Henry C Tong; Karen S J Yamakawa; Douglas J Quint; Julian T Hoff; Anthony Chiodo; Jennifer A Miner; Vaishali R Choksi; Michael E Geisser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Somatosensory evoked potentials after multisegmental lower limb stimulation in focal lesions of the lumbosacral spinal cord.

Authors:  D Restuccia; A Insola; M Valeriani; V Santilli; L Bedini; D Le Pera; C Barba; F Denaro; P Tonali
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Electrophysiology of radiculopathies.

Authors:  Morris A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M Zanetti; J Hodler; N Boos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Diabetic neuropathies.

Authors:  A I Vinik; M T Holland; J M Le Beau; F J Liuzzi; K B Stansberry; L B Colen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements.

Authors:  J M Fritz; A Delitto; W C Welch; R E Erhard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: is it useful in clinical practice?

Authors:  B Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Micankova Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical value of motor evoked potentials with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Shunsuke Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Yoshikazu Gembun; Gen Horiguchi; Hiromoto Ito
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Leg weakness in a patient with lumbar stenosis and adrenal insufficiency.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Suk-Won Ahn; Jeong-Taik Kwon; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-04-30

5.  Clinical classification of cauda equina syndrome for proper treatment.

Authors:  Jiangang Shi; Lanshun Jia; Wen Yuan; GouDong Shi; Bin Ma; Bo Wang; JianFeng Wu
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Change in onset times of the abdominal muscles following functional task in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hyun Seung Song; Seong Doo Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2014-10-31

7.  Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Marco Crostelli; Marco Grimaldi; Osvaldo Mazza; Carla Anania; Maurizio Fornari; Francesco Costa
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-02-28

8.  Findings of Electrodiagnostic Studies in Moderate to Severe Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis-Electrodiagnostic Studies in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Min Cheol Chang; Donghwi Park
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03

9.  Can the severity of central lumbar stenosis affect the results of nerve conduction study?

Authors:  Seung Wha Jang; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.