Literature DB >> 15163351

A microsatellite linkage map of Drosophila mojavensis.

Regina Staten1, Sheri Dixon Schully, Mohamed A F Noor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drosophila mojavensis has been a model system for genetic studies of ecological adaptation and speciation. However, despite its use for over half a century, no linkage map has been produced for this species or its close relatives.
RESULTS: We have developed and mapped 90 microsatellites in D. mojavensis, and we present a detailed recombinational linkage map of 34 of these microsatellites. A slight excess of repetitive sequence was observed on the X-chromosome relative to the autosomes, and the linkage groups have a greater recombinational length than the homologous D. melanogaster chromosome arms. We also confirmed the conservation of Muller's elements in 23 sequences between D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis.
CONCLUSIONS: The microsatellite primer sequences and localizations are presented here and made available to the public. This map will facilitate future quantitative trait locus mapping studies of phenotypes involved in adaptation or reproductive isolation using this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163351      PMCID: PMC420461          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-5-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genet        ISSN: 1471-2156            Impact factor:   2.797


Background

Evolutionary biologists have struggled to determine the number and types of genetic changes that lead to speciation. Recent advances in molecular techniques facilitate a more thorough investigation into these issues. For example, by mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting interesting traits, we can explore the genetic basis of phenotypic variation between two populations that may lead to reproductive isolation. One hallmark species used in studies of speciation and ecological adaptation is the desert cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. D. mojavensis belongs to the mulleri complex of the repleta species group within the subgenus Drosophila. Unlike many well-studied Drosophila, its ecological niche has been well documented, and extensive cytogenetic work has been done on it and its close relative, D. arizonae [see e.g., [1]]. With regard to speciation, D. mojavensis has been the subject of many genetic and phenotypic studies of mate choice [e.g., [2-5]], hybrid sterility and inviability [6,7], and variation in sperm and female sperm-storage organ length [8,9]. However, all of these studies have been forced to use a handful of either allozyme or morphological mutant markers. Microsatellites have been isolated from this species before [10], but they are unmapped and their sequences are not available. Here, we present a microsatellite-based linkage map of the five major chromosomes of D. mojavensis using a new set of markers. We mapped 25 microsatellites to the X chromosome and 65 microsatellites spanning the four major autosomes. We also use our results to confirm the conservation of Muller's chromosome elements [11] across approximately 65 million years of evolutionary divergence between D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis [see [12]]. Muller [11] had suggested that chromosomal elements conserve their identities (ie, complement of genes) across all Drosophila species, and several subsequent studies have supported this idea [e.g., [13-15]], though only one study involving the repleta group [16].

Results and Discussion

Primers were successfully developed for a total of 116 markers. Of these, 26 did not distinguish between the two isofemale lines that were used for mapping and were therefore not pursued. We mapped 25 microsatellites onto the X-chromosome, 10 onto chromosome 2, 7 onto chromosome 3, 13 onto chromosome 4, and 10 onto chromosome 5. Twenty-five more microsatellites were confirmed to be autosomal but could not be mapped because of segregating polymorphism within our lines. Microsatellites were named based on their localizations, where the fifth character of the name was an X if X-linked, A if unmapped autosomal, or a number indicating a specific autosome. The distribution of microsatellites across the chromosomes suggests a possible excess of repetitive sequences on the X-chromosome (27.8% observed vs. 20% expected assuming all chromosomes are similar in size, chi-square test, p = 0.07; 27.8% observed vs. 18.7% expected assuming chromosomes are the same size as D. melanogaster homologous chromosome arms, chi-square test, p = 0.03). Using two female-parent backcrosses, we constructed a recombinational map of the Drosophila mojavensis genome using 34 of our microsatellites: 13 on the X-chromosome, 7 on chromosome 2, 4 on chromosome 3, 7 on chromosome 4, and 3 on chromosome 5. Recombinational distances are presented in Figure 1. DMOJX040 was not placed in the figure because it was only 0.7 cM from DMOJX030. The recombinational lengths of the chromosomes generally exceed the homologous chromosome arms in D. melanogaster and some other Drosophila species. For example, the X-chromosome in D. mojavensis spanned 130.8 cM, while the X-chromosome in D. melanogaster spans only 73 cM. Even within the repleta species group, D. buzzatii has an X-chromosome that spans 109 cM [17] and D. hydei's X spans 116 cM [12]. Similarly, D. mojavensis chromosome 2 could only be assembled into three pieces that recombine freely from each other. This difference between species in recombinational length most likely indicates an overall greater recombination rate per megabase in D. mojavensis, but we cannot exclude dramatic differences in sequence lengths of the chromosome arms.
Figure 1

Linkage map of the five major chromosomes of Drosophila mojavensis. From left to right, are the X-chromosome, chromosome 2, chromosome 3, chromosome 4, and chromosome 5. Kosambi recombinational distances between markers are on the left of each chromosome, and the microsatellite names are on the right. A question mark appears between markers or groups when markers were assigned to the same chromosomes but freely recombined from each other.

Linkage map of the five major chromosomes of Drosophila mojavensis. From left to right, are the X-chromosome, chromosome 2, chromosome 3, chromosome 4, and chromosome 5. Kosambi recombinational distances between markers are on the left of each chromosome, and the microsatellite names are on the right. A question mark appears between markers or groups when markers were assigned to the same chromosomes but freely recombined from each other. We recombinationally mapped some markers in a second cross because of segregating variation within the lines. Figure 1 presents the most conservative map, where all markers were mapped against each other for any particular chromosome. However, we have some additional information about the linkage of other microsatellites. Specifically, we observed that DMOJ4200 is freely recombining from all the 4-chromosome markers between and including DMOJ4010 and DMOJ4060. Also, the following markers are freely recombining from each other on chromosome 5: DMOJ5100, DMOJ5200, DMOJ5300, and DMOJ5400. To evaluate the conservation of Muller's elements across 65 million years, we used BLAST [18] to identify segments homologous to the sequences flanking the 65 microsatellites in D. mojavensis that were mapped to chromosome. We identified segments mapped to D. melanogaster chromosomes similar to 23 of the sequences isolated from D. mojavensis (see Table 1). The inferred homology of the arms are as follows (melanogaster:mojavensis): X:X, 2L:3, 2R:5, 3L:4, 3R:2 [19,20]. Based on the BLAST results, all 23 D. mojavensis sequences matched D. melanogaster sequences on the homologous chromosome arms. This observation strongly supports the conservation of Muller's elements between the subgenera Drosophila (D. mojavensis) and Sophophora (D. melanogaster).
Table 1

Ninety microsatellites mapped in Drosophila mojavensis. Microsatellites assigned to chromosome "A" were autosomal but could not be mapped to a particular autosome because of variation segregating within the lines used for mapping. We present the BLAST expect (E) value in the column after the microsatellite name only for the 23 microsatellites used in the Muller's chromosome element comparison.

NameBLAST E-valueChromosomeSizePrimersRepeat motifGenBank Accession
DMOJX010X132attgtgttgcgccttagggcgtgataatttgttgatttgggtgcatgtc(ca)11AY578823
DMOJX020X142ctctgccactcaacggaccctcttcagtgttgcctagggtatac(ca)7AY578824
DMOJX030X124aagctatgcctagttgtcacttcccaaacggcatttcatataagaatctatctcac(ag)9AY578825
DMOJX040X147aggcatgccttagtttgtgtcaccacacatattaagcattgtattacaatcgtccc(ac)15AY578826
DMOJX050X143accaagcaaaagccaattgcaccaaagctttgccggcattagc(ac)12AY578827
DMOJX060X128caattgtggagttgcgtttgcaccacgcatttctgattgaccatacac(ac)12AY578828
DMOJX0701e-19X163gccactcgttgttgtccctaatagttctttgctctatatgcgtgtg(ca)4AY578829
DMOJX080X202ccactccacgttcgcttgaccacaatgtagagctccctttaatctcc(ac)14AY578830
DMOJX090X149ccttcaactttgtcgctccagaccaatcaaagcgaacgtagctcaatg(ca)9AY578831
DMOJX100X160tttgtatataaggcggaaaggcgggtctgtatataatttaataagttgttacgtaaaagaactcac(gt)20AY578832
DMOJX1102e-09X98cagtggcgctcaaaaggtctggggatgtatggggtctatgggtg(ca)9AY578833
DMOJX120X110gcctgcatttgtgcatctgccaagtgtttgccaaagctgcag(tg)13AY578834
DMOJX130X130tgggctacacttcagcaaacattctcatgtgcaaaggtagccaagc(ca)11AY578835
DMOJX500X100caattattgcatagccacgccccgagcacttttccaatttttggc(gt)11AY578836
DMOJX501X136ctcgagcgaattttcctattggatttcccaacgagccatttcctcacg(ca)6AY578837
DMOJX502X107attaaagtgcattaaatgacacagccacctctgccttcacgtgtgc(ca)10AY578838
DMOJX503X136gcgaagaattgcaaatacccttgtagaagcaaatatacacaacatacacatgtgc(gt)10AY578839
DMOJX504X126catcaatctctagaatgcctcacgcgagtgactcactttaaagcgagctc(gt)8AY578840
DMOJX5050.004X128tcgcttgtttccgtttagtaaccgtacgcgtatgcgtatgcatgc(ac)10AY578841
DMOJX5062e-15X149actgcctacactgctctgtctcacaggctttacacatggccaaataac(tc)16AY578842
DMOJX507X166ttttctttgcatcggcttagttgccacatatggaaatgcagcacgaac(tc)15AY578843
DMOJX5084e-43X248aagcagcctagctgaacagttgcattgggaagagctgatgtatagacg(ac)12AY578844
DMOJX509X157agctgattaacgaagcagatttcgtgttccattcatgaaccactcacacatc(ga)18AY578845
DMOJX510X169atttggctgctgcgagacggatttgtgccactgtgcaatgg(ag)18AY578846
DMOJX511X177gcttcagtgagcctcaaatgaaactgcagctggcatgggtataag(ct)16AY578847
DMOJ20102157acgagtttgccatgaactggattgaaagccgaaacttgtattcatttggc(ac)14AY578848
DMOJ20202153attgacttagcgtgtgagcgtgcgctgtctcatttacataggtcgg(gt)7AY578849
DMOJ20302199tgacgcgccaatcagttgacgattcaaggtgtcatatctatatgtgtgtagg(gt)16AY578850
DMOJ21004e-052187ggcgctcccttaatcacagatacagcatgtgtctgcttgctgt(ag)17AY578851
DMOJ22003e-212148gtcgctccatagagttctacaagtttgcgcctccaagtaattcacgaagc(gt)9AY578852
DMOJ22102139cccagcaagtgtactctactcaagtgctgcatcaataaagaaggcaaac(ca)8AY578853
DMOJ22200.0022136gttggctttggctattggactgagtgtgcaatgtgactggcaactg(gt)6AY578854
DMOJ23001e-052114aattgacagcactccgtggcgttcagcgccggccttac(ca)12AY578855
DMOJ23012158ctcttagcggcaggtgtcaagaatcttatcgaaaatatgcaacacgatgg(caa)11AY578856
DMOJ23028e-172193ctctcgctgtttctcttgtctcttatacaactgatttaccgctcgctatacag(ac)9AY578857
DMOJ30104e-053218gcccgccggagttcaatagatgtgtatggccagtgctacattt(ct)8AY578858
DMOJ30204e-23394acgtggattacgaacacgagctttggccaatttgagcaactgc(ca)14AY578859
DMOJ3030391cctagtttctttggccaccctaccgcagtgaaacgcatggaaac(ca)11AY578860
DMOJ3040394gtcaggtgtcagcagcagcgcctcaacagcacctactgag(ac)12AY578861
DMOJ3100387ctgatttgtcaccacagggactcgctaatcgaagcacacacatgtattcag(ca)10AY578862
DMOJ31017e-253150aacggcggcatccgttgactgtcatcgcacaaatgatttgta(gt)12AY578863
DMOJ31023210ctctctgtagcaaaaggcttttgtaacctgctgtgtgcagcacgaac(ca)11AY578864
DMOJ4010490agccagtgcaatgccagcgcctggaccttgtgggc(ca)16AY578865
DMOJ40204121cagcagctgccttatgtcagcaataaatcgcagcagccaggac(ac)10AY578866
DMOJ40307e-054137gtagttgttgtaggcacgcatacaaatgagaatgagaactggaacggg(ca)10AY578867
DMOJ40401e-074161gcaacatgtgctccactcgttcttttcccacacttcttgcagcag(ca)11AY578868
DMOJ40504196atcgcatagaaagacactcatacgcctggaggcaagggaagtttcg(ca)9AY578869
DMOJ40604211cgagactcgctgataagtaaagccgattgtaattttggccgtgcgc(ac)41AY578870
DMOJ41004126cgcagacatatttgtctcccagcttcgtagccaagacaaactcacaac(ga)11AY578871
DMOJ42003e-104120gcttcaagccttgtgatttgttgcaagaagaacaagcgcattatgcaaa(ct)24AY578872
DMOJ43004165ggaaagaataccaacgcctatggcgtccgcagacagccagc(ca)12AY578873
DMOJ43014133acatttggctgttacctggcacccaatgccagtgagtttctctctc(ca)12AY578874
DMOJ43022e-424218gtgtgtgcgtggatgtgttttacgacagcactgaacagattatagataagcc(ag)18AY578875
DMOJ43034174cacggcaacacttgcagttaccccattgctcatagcccgtttacc(ag)23AY578876
DMOJ43044171ggcacattgccacaagtgtactctgtgccggaaatcgtcaac(ga)20AY578877
DMOJ50106e-045117ggcatagggaccgcagcgtaaatattcgccaaacacctacatgc(ac)8AY578878
DMOJ50204e-065144ctacaggtatgaagaacctgaacccacaacagcctacacgcactc(gt)11AY578879
DMOJ51008e-185156agacaacttgactgttgctcgctgacactgattggtcgctgtg(gt)8AY578880
DMOJ52002e-265154tcgcacaactggcgcatgatttttacagcacgcttaacaagaattttcac(ca)13AY578881
DMOJ5300597gtggtggacatcaaccagcctgagccaactttgagcataaattagcc(ca)9AY578882
DMOJ54005e-085109cttggatttcagctcagtcgctccgccacaatcagtcataggtcc(gt)10AY578883
DMOJ55005121ggaagcgtcgactgcataccgtgttgaaacgtatgtgtttgtgcc(ca)10AY578884
DMOJ55011e-04599cgtgccacgtaaactcttgccgaaggcaattcaattagttttgagagttatccc(ac)9AY578885
DMOJ55025115gcatattgacaaggacgagctgtctctgagtgcgtccattactttgtatc(gt)12AY578886
DMOJ55035150gtatacgacatgttggcactgccttgcaagctgggcgtaagc(tg)10AY578887
DMOJA500A185gagactgtttgacgcccgctcgatagacatgagtttggtctagaaacc(tg)8AY578888
DMOJA501A140tcagtagcctctgctacggccgaacggaaattatgaactagtcagcc(tc)30AY578889
DMOJA502A138ctgaaagttctggcagcaagagtgtgtaatttagttgttagacgcgattgagag(ct)14AY578890
DMOJA503A153taaggctctgtttcgtaactttgccctgtcaatgtgctaaacattgcaacc(ca)9AY578891
DMOJA504A222aatcatctgccccctttccacggaaaatgatgctcaggcaggt(ac)13AY578892
DMOJA505A181ccatagtgcgatgcacgcttcgccatagcccatagtagccaag(tg)10AY578893
DMOJA506A147attaatgcaggccggaaagtcggctcgctctgcgtcgttatg(gt)11AY578894
DMOJA507A134tcagccgggatgttaactaacttgatgcttaccagagcgaatggc(ac)12AY578895
DMOJA508A196ctctgcgacatgtagactacgcgataaagttgaacttttactaccgatgcattc(tg)10AY578896
DMOJA509A186gctgagaaacaaatttcgcatgcctgttgttgtcctttaacgaacgttcc(tg)18AY578897
DMOJA510A105cacacagccagacttgacgttaggcttttgattttgtcatagccattgctaaac(tg)12AY578898
DMOJA511A162cttttctggctattacgagagcagcaaaacataatgtaattgagctgacaaagcaac(tg)30AY578899
DMOJA512A120gatgagaaataggcgttgctgtccgcatatgatgaaggctgagagctc(ca)11AY578900
DMOJA513A120gctcagctaacagaaacacccagccgtagctgcagcatct(tg)13AY578901
DMOJA514A125atggcgcaactcggtcggcagcacatttggctgctg(gt)12AY578902
DMOJA515A203gaccgaacagcgcagcccacaaacctacataaacaccgcagtc(ac)11AY578903
DMOJA516A163ggctgtaccaagcacacactccgctcgtgtcgtcgtcttc(ca)13AY578904
DMOJA517A87gaaaacagctgcaaacccgtaaaggctctcttaagcgctcaactatatagac(ca)15AY578905
DMOJA518A118gtatgtatgggcatacagcgggcttggttctatgatatgatgacgtgtct(ca)7AY578906
DMOJA519A182atgaataggaatccagccagcgagcgctttgcgtgcctac(ca)14AY578907
DMOJA520A164tttcggcgcaaggtcgtcttagcttctttaccggcatcatgc(gt)8AY578908
DMOJA521A96ttttgtttaggttttgcgcctaaccttttccataatttgtgcgtgtgcc(ac)9AY578909
DMOJA522A122cctttcgagtgcctccacaacgtcccactacatattgctacagctg(ca)11AY578910
DMOJA523A147gcgtaagcacagttggactctctgtctgcggagttttatgctgtaa(ct)23AY578911
DMOJA524A135tcgagagagattcgatcgagagccctgtttgcattatgtgggtgtc(ac)12AY578912
Ninety microsatellites mapped in Drosophila mojavensis. Microsatellites assigned to chromosome "A" were autosomal but could not be mapped to a particular autosome because of variation segregating within the lines used for mapping. We present the BLAST expect (E) value in the column after the microsatellite name only for the 23 microsatellites used in the Muller's chromosome element comparison.

Conclusions

We have developed and mapped a panel of 90 variable microsatellites for genetic studies in a model system for ecological genetics and speciation: Drosophila mojavensis. Thirty-four of these microsatellites have been placed onto a detailed linkage map of this species. We also confirmed that Muller's chromosome elements were conserved between D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis, species separated by 65 million years of independent evolution, in 23 of 65 sequences tested. Given the long-term interest in this species for studies of adaptation and speciation, the construction of a linkage map and presentation of variable microsatellite sequences will facilitate future work in this area.

Methods

Isolation of microsatellite sequences

We used a modification of Hamilton et al's [21] enrichment technique to increase the proportion of microsatellites in the genomic DNA insert library prior to cloning [see also [22]]. This procedure uses a subtractive hybridization, in which streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and biotinylated oligonucleotide repeats retain single-stranded genomic DNA fragments containing repeat sequences. Genomic DNA was isolated from approximately 30 D. mojavensis individuals from a mixture of strains using the Puregene™ DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems). Except where indicated, we used reagent concentrations and reaction conditions suggested by Hamilton et al [21]. The enrichment procedure was repeated seven times. For each enrichment, one of the following enzymes was used with NheI to digest Drosophila mojavensis genomic DNA: Sau3AI, BfucI, RsaI, AluI, or HpyCH4III. Linker sequences were ligated to the digested DNA to provide a PCR priming site. We then hybridized the digested, linker-ligated DNA to a biotinylated oligonucleotide repeat motif, either (CA)15 or (AG)15, and recovered the microsatellite-enriched DNA. The DNA was amplified via PCR, and fragments between 300 and 800 bp were recovered from an agarose gel for cloning. We then used the Invitrogen TOPO-TA cloning kit to clone the DNA into plasmids and transform into E. coli. We omitted the chemiluminescent screen and used pUC19 primers to amplify D. mojavensis DNA inserts directly from colonies. Each 50 μl reaction volume contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 20 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.5 μM pUC forward and reverse primers, and 1.0 unit Taq polymerase (AmpliTaq, Perkin Elmer). DNA was added by touching a sterile toothpick to a colony and swirling the toothpick into the reaction mix. We used the following thermal profile: 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 60 s; 55°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; rapid thermal ramp to 40°C. PCR products were sequenced with an ABIPrism® Big Dye™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit, and products were visualized on ABI sequencers in the LSU Museum of Natural Science, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, or the Department of Biological Sciences' genomics facility.

Fly stocks

Several inbred lines of D. mojavensis were tested to determine the most suitable lines for constructing a microsatellite map based on microsatellite allelic differences between strains, bearing the same chromosomal arrangements, and lack of segregating microsatellite alleles. In the end, we selected the lines A993 (Rancho El Diamante, Sonora) and A924 (St. Rosa Mtns., AZ), obtained from Dr. William J. Etges. These lines were further brother-sister mated for 9–12 generations to ensure thorough inbreeding and a reduction of segregating alleles.

Microsatellite assay conditions

We designed two primers for each microsatellite-bearing sequence, one bearing an M13(-29) tail. A 10 μL PCR reaction was then performed using 0.5 μM of each primer, 1.0 μL of dNTPs, 1.0 μL of 10X PCR buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.3, 500 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2), 0.4 μL of IRDye (LiCor), 1U Taq DNA polymerase, and 0.5 μL from a single fly DNA preparation (Puregene). We sometimes added 1.0 μL of 10 mM MgCl2 to the reaction or more polymerase to optimize the results of the PCR. A touchdown PCR cycle was performed [23], and amplifications were visualized on acrylamide gels on our LiCor DNA analyzer.

Assignment to linkage groups

Virgin females and males of the A993 and A924 lines were crossed and offspring reared. DNA was isolated from the parents and progeny using the Puregene™ DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems). We determined if markers differentiating the lines were X-linked or autosomal by comparing the F1 males to the F1 females and parent strains. For X-linked markers, males consistently bore one allele while females consistently bore two. Autosomal markers were further tested using 20 progeny of a male-parent backcross. Because there is no recombination in Drosophila males, the offspring all inherited a nonrecombinant chromosome from one of the original lines. By comparing genotypes across the male-parent backcross progeny, markers were assigned to linkage groups. We also used the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool [BLAST: [18]] to identify putatively homologous sequences in D. melanogaster. Sequences bearing an expect (E) value below 0.01 were scored, as E-values are nearly identical to probability (p) values in that range.

Recombinational mapping within linkage groups

Virgin F1 females (progeny of the cross described in "Assigning to linkage groups") were backcrossed to males of one of the pure lines (A924). To ascertain the recombinational distances between the markers on each chromosome, we genotyped the parents and 200 progeny with each marker previously assigned to a linkage group. Recombinational distances were estimated in Kosambi centiMorgans using Mapmaker [24].

Authors' contributions

RS maintained all fly cultures and performed all reactions and analyses involved in the recombinational mapping of microsatellites. SDS and MAFN produced the microsatellite genomic libraries, sequenced the clones, and designed the primers. All authors contributed to the preparation of this manuscript.
  16 in total

1.  Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites.

Authors:  M B Hamilton; E L Pincus; A Di Fiore; R C Fleischer
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Quantitative genetic analysis of among-population variation in sperm and female sperm-storage organ length in Drosophila mojavensis.

Authors:  Gary T Miller; William T Starmer; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis.

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Gary T Miller; Karin Schneider; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Chromosomal homologies between Drosophila melanogaster and D. funebris determined by in-situ hybridization.

Authors:  P Gallego; E Juan; M Papaceit
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller's elements D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group.

Authors:  J M Ranz; C Segarra; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Rapid divergence of microsatellite abundance among species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Charles L Ross; Kelly A Dyer; Tamar Erez; Susan J Miller; John Jaenike; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Premating isolation is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations.

Authors:  W J Etges; M A Ahrens
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  In situ hybridization analysis of chromosomal homologies in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  J H Whiting; M D Pliley; J L Farmer; D E Jeffery
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green; J Abrahamson; A Barlow; M J Daly; S E Lincoln; L A Newberg; L Newburg
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  10 in total

1.  A recombination survey using microsatellites: the O chromosome of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Cinta Pegueroles; Pedro A Araúz; Marta Pascual; Francesc Mestres
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium as a consequence of meiotic drive.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Brian Charlesworth; John Jaenike
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Polytene chromosomal maps of 11 Drosophila species: the order of genomic scaffolds inferred from genetic and physical maps.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer; Arjun Bhutkar; Bryant F McAllister; Muneo Matsuda; Luciano M Matzkin; Patrick M O'Grady; Claudia Rohde; Vera L S Valente; Montserrat Aguadé; Wyatt W Anderson; Kevin Edwards; Ana C L Garcia; Josh Goodman; James Hartigan; Eiko Kataoka; Richard T Lapoint; Elena R Lozovsky; Carlos A Machado; Mohamed A F Noor; Montserrat Papaceit; Laura K Reed; Stephen Richards; Tania T Rieger; Susan M Russo; Hajime Sato; Carmen Segarra; Douglas R Smith; Temple F Smith; Victor Strelets; Yoshiko N Tobari; Yoshihiko Tomimura; Marvin Wasserman; Thomas Watts; Robert Wilson; Kiyohito Yoshida; Therese A Markow; William M Gelbart; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  An integrated genetic and cytogenetic map for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata, based on microsatellite and morphological markers.

Authors:  Elias E Stratikopoulos; Antonios A Augustinos; Yannis G Petalas; Michael N Vrahatis; Anastasios Mintzas; Konstantinos D Mathiopoulos; Antigone Zacharopoulou
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Occasional recombination of a selfish X-chromosome may permit its persistence at high frequencies in the wild.

Authors:  K E Pieper; K A Dyer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Genomic resources for multiple species in the Drosophila ananassae species group.

Authors:  Sarah Signor; Thaddeus Seher; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.160

7.  Exploration of the Drosophila buzzatii transposable element content suggests underestimation of repeats in Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Nuria Rius; Yolanda Guillén; Alejandra Delprat; Aurélie Kapusta; Cédric Feschotte; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Assessing the Architecture of Drosophila mojavensis Locomotor Evolution with Bulk Segregant Analysis.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Joshua M Coleman; Luciano M Matzkin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genetic architecture of hybrid male sterility in Drosophila: analysis of intraspecies variation for interspecies isolation.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Brooke A LaFlamme; Therese A Markow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila virilis results in clusters of mitotic recombination and loss-of-heterozygosity but leaves meiotic recombination unaltered.

Authors:  Lucas W Hemmer; Guilherme B Dias; Brittny Smith; Kelley Van Vaerenberghe; Ashley Howard; Casey M Bergman; Justin P Blumenstiel
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-02-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.