Literature DB >> 12777536

Rapid divergence of microsatellite abundance among species of Drosophila.

Charles L Ross1, Kelly A Dyer, Tamar Erez, Susan J Miller, John Jaenike, Therese A Markow.   

Abstract

Among major taxonomic groups, microsatellites exhibit considerable variation in composition and allele length, but they also show considerable conservation within many major groups. This variation may be explained by slow microsatellite evolution so that all species within a group have similar patterns of variation, or by taxon-specific mutational or selective constraints. Unfortunately, comparing microsatellites across species and studies can be problematic because of biases that may exist among different isolation and analysis protocols. We present microsatellite data from five Drosophila species in the Drosophila subgenus: D. arizonae, D. mojavensis, and D. pachea (three cactophilic species), and D. neotestacea and D. recens (two mycophagous species), all isolated at the same time using identical protocols. For each species, we compared the relative abundance of motifs, the distribution of repeat size, and the average number of repeats. Dimers were the most abundant microsatellites for each species. However, we found considerable variation in the relative abundance of motif size classes among species, even between sister taxa. Frequency differences among motifs within size classes for the three cactophilic species, but not the two mycophagous species, are consistent with other studied Drosophila. Frequency distributions of repeat number, as well as mean size, show significant differences among motif size classes but not across species. Sizes of microsatellites in these five species are consistent with D. virilis, another species in the subgenus Drosophila, but they have consistently higher means than in D. melanogaster, in the subgenus Sophophora. These results confirm that many aspects of microsatellite variation evolve quickly but also are subject to taxon-specific constraints. In addition, the nature of microsatellite evolution is dependent on temporal and taxonomic scales, and some variation is conserved across broad taxonomic levels despite relatively high rates of mutation for these loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12777536     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  24 in total

1.  Distribution of microsatellites in the genome of Medicago truncatula: a resource of genetic markers that integrate genetic and physical maps.

Authors:  Jeong-Hwan Mun; Dong-Jin Kim; Hong-Kyu Choi; John Gish; Frédéric Debellé; Joanne Mudge; Roxanne Denny; Gabriella Endré; Oliver Saurat; Anne-Marie Dudez; Gyorgy B Kiss; Bruce Roe; Nevin D Young; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Lessons from a beetle and an ant: coping with taxon-dependent differences in microsatellite development success.

Authors:  Wolfgang Arthofer; Birgit C Schlick-Steiner; Florian M Steiner; Dimitrios N Avtzis; Ross H Crozier; Christian Stauffer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Evolution of microsatellite loci in the adaptive radiation of Hawaiian honeycreepers.

Authors:  Lori S Eggert; Jon S Beadell; Andrew McClung; Carl E McIntosh; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  Next generation sequencing and FISH reveal uneven and nonrandom microsatellite distribution in two grasshopper genomes.

Authors:  Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Ángeles Cuadrado; Eugenia E Montiel; Juan Pedro M Camacho; María Dolores López-León
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The genetic structure of Drosophila ananassae populations from Asia, Australia and Samoa.

Authors:  Malcolm D Schug; Shelly G Smith; Allison Tozier-Pearce; Shane F McEvey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.

Authors:  Emily R Bewick; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Evolution of Tom, 297, 17.6 and rover retrotransposons in Drosophilidae species.

Authors:  Newton Medeiros Vidal; Adriana Ludwig; Elgion Lucio Silva Loreto
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Reconstruction and Analysis of the Immune-Related LINC00987/A2M Axis in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jiakang Ma; Xiaoyan Lin; Xueting Wang; Qingqing Min; Tonglian Wang; Chaozhi Tang
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-04-27

9.  Patterns of evolutionary conservation of microsatellites (SSRs) suggest a faster rate of genome evolution in Hymenoptera than in Diptera.

Authors:  Eckart Stolle; Jonathan H Kidner; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Large-scale isolation of microsatellites from Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis via a Solexa Genomic Survey.

Authors:  Liang-Wei Xiong; Qun Wang; Gao-Feng Qiu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.