Literature DB >> 1516333

Comparison of alumina-polyethylene and metal-polyethylene in clinical trials.

L P Zichner1, H G Willert.   

Abstract

The dimensional changes of hip sockets of Müller-type total endoprostheses is the subject of this article. Regular anteroposterior roentgenographs of the pelvis were taken to determine the orientation of the center of the prosthetic head in relation to the wire marker of the polyethylene cup. Three different materials used for the femoral balls and matched with polyethylene as socket material were investigated, and the results of the displacement of the ball into the socket were compared. Both creep and wear contribute to the dimensional changes of the hip sockets; the proportional amount of each mechanism is not known. Data from laboratory examinations suggest a relatively high rate of creep in the first six months after implantation. With longer periods, the dimensional changes are predominately caused by wear. In the beginning of joint function, measurements show a high rate of the yearly dimensional changes. The head shifts up to 0.5 mm per year and diminishes after five years to rates of 0.1-0.2 mm, respectively. All dimensional changes that exceed a shift of the head of 0.2 mm per year are considered to be unfavorable and to contribute to loosening of the implants. Using metallic balls (Protasul-2), 64% had a wear rate of less than 0.2 mm; of those using Prostasul-10, 77% had lower rates than 0.2 mm. In patients where ceramic balls were implanted, the displacement rate was below 0.2 mm per year in 95%. Therefore, ceramic seems to be the most favorable material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1516333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Ten-year results with the Morscher press-fit cup: an uncemented, non-modular, porous-coated cup inserted without screws.

Authors:  Guido Garavaglia; Anne Lübbeke; Christophe Barea; Constantinos Roussos; Robin Peter; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Implant materials for hip endoprostheses: old proofs and new trends.

Authors:  M Semlitsch; H G Willert
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Phase and microstructural development in alumina sol-gel coatings on CoCr alloy.

Authors:  I J Bae; O C Standard; G J Roger; D Brazil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Alumina-on-Polyethylene Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yup Lee Jung; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-11

5.  How safe are ceramic heads as hip endoprostheses? A series of three head fractures within 3 months.

Authors:  A Burckhardt; C Berberat
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  [Fracture of the ceramic head in total hip prosthesis. Apropos of 2 cases].

Authors:  P Mangione; X Pascarel; B Vinciguerra; J L Honton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of cobalt-chrome and oxidized zirconium on highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Stephen M Petis; Edward M Vasarhelyi; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Douglas D R Naudie; Lyndsay E Somerville; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Retrieval analysis of new-generation yttria-stabilized zirconia femoral heads after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.