Literature DB >> 27845965

The Necessity of the Nipple: Redefining Completeness in Breast Reconstruction.

E Hope Weissler1, Julie B Schnur, Andreas M Lamelas, Marisa Cornejo, Elan Horesh, Peter J Taub.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Satisfaction with breast reconstruction is thought to be greatest among patients who complete nipple and areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction. Anecdotally, many patients are known to decline NAC reconstruction. The authors aimed to characterize the epidemiology of and factors associated with incomplete breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Breast reconstruction patients with follow-up in a single institution's electronic medical record system were reviewed. Chi-squared and independent t-tests were used to identify variables associated with lack of NAC reconstruction; associated variables (P < 0.05) were used to build a binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three patients were reviewed. Reconstructions consisted of an average of 4.0 ± 2.0 procedures over 503 (range, 2-3,652) days. One hundred twelve patients had NAC reconstruction or tattooing (25.9%) and 73 (17.6%) had both-226 women (54.6%) had neither. On multivariate analysis, a history of any implant removal was associated with a 93.4% decreased chance of NAC reconstruction (P = 0.002), whereas prophylactic or early-stage mastectomy was associated with 52.9% increased chances of NAC reconstruction (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the present cohort did not complete any NAC reconstruction. Patients with later-stage cancer and a history of implant removal were less likely to have NAC reconstruction. The high prevalence of incomplete reconstructions suggests that the classical definition of breast reconstruction completion as requiring NAC reconstruction may be outdated or not applicable to all populations. Instead, "completion" should be considered a subjective determination varying between patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27845965      PMCID: PMC5425304          DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  16 in total

1.  Patient-subjective cosmetic outcomes following the varying stages of tissue expander breast reconstruction: the importance of completion.

Authors:  Donald W Buck; Deana Shenaq; Kamaldeep Heyer; Caroline Kato; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Y Ramon; Y Ullmann; R Moscona; E Ofiram; A Tamir; Y Har-Shai; H Toledano; A Barzilai; I J Peled
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Three-dimensional nipple-areola tattooing: a new technique with superior results.

Authors:  Eric G Halvorson; Michael Cormican; Misti E West; Vinnie Myers
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.

Authors:  W N Andrade; N Baxter; J L Semple
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A retrospective investigation of women's experience with breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  Nina Ditsch; Ingo Bauerfeind; Andrea Vodermaier; Christina Tripp; Bettina Löhrs; Bettina Toth; Isabelle Himsl; Monika Graeser; Nadia Harbeck; Miriam Lenhard
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction. A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality.

Authors:  L R Schover; R J Yetman; L J Tuason; E Meisler; C B Esselstyn; R E Hermann; S Grundfest-Broniatowski; R V Dowden
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Nipple and areola reconstruction. A study in 79 mastectomized women.

Authors:  O Asplund
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1983

8.  Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Albert Losken; Grant W Carlson; Mark B Schoemann; Glyn E Jones; John H Culbertson; T Roderick Hester
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant.

Authors:  K A Tønseth; B M Hokland; T T Tindholdt; F E Abyholm; K Stavem
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  The number of operations required for completing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Sup Eom; Mark Robert Kobayashi; Keyianoosh Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Gregory R D Evans
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-11-07
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Sisti
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.