Literature DB >> 15156386

Outcome after intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic appendectomy techniques.

S A Suttie1, S Seth, C P Driver, A A Mahomed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the outcome after intracorporeal (IC) and extracorporeal (EC) laparoscopic appendectomy technique in a single institution over a 5-year period.
METHODS: Records of all children ( n = 60) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at the Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital between February 1997 and March 2002 were retrieved and evaluated. Observations were made regarding operative technique, anesthetic time, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative analgesic requirement, and postoperative hospital stay.
RESULTS: There were 30 children in each group who had a similar demographic profile. The magnitude of appendicitis severity in both groups was similar. The mean anesthetic time was 67.8 min for the IC group and 50.7 min for the EC group (p = 0.001). There were no recorded intraoperative complications, although a single case in the EC group required conversion to open procedure. The postoperative analgesic requirement in both groups was similar. The mean postoperative stay was 2.1 days in the IC group and 2.5 days in the EC group. Two postoperative complications were noted in the IC group; one intraperitoneal collection and one postoperative chest infection. Four complications occurred in the EC group; one intraperitoneal collection and three minor port-site wound infections.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience shows the EC technique to be significantly quicker, although with a slightly increased complication rate. Either technique can be applied safely for acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15156386     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9135-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A G Pedersen; O B Petersen; P Wara; H Rønning; N Qvist; S Laurberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; S Larsen; E Trondsen; B Edwin; A E Faerden; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Acute appendicitis: the continuing role for active observation.

Authors:  P Bachoo; A A Mahomed; G K Ninan; G G Youngson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children.

Authors:  H Lintula; H Kokki; K Vanamo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy: An unnecessary and expensive procedure in children?

Authors:  Danny C Little; Monford D Custer; Brett H May; Shannon E Blalock; Donald R Cooney
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy.

Authors:  C K Kum; S S Ngoi; P M Goh; Y Tekant; J R Isaac
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  W Richards; D Watson; G Lynch; G W Reed; D Olsen; A Spaw; W Holcomb; M Frexes-Steed; R Goldstein; K Sharp
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-11

8.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  V L Vallina; J M Velasco; C S McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  L C Martin; I Puente; J L Sosa; A Bassin; R Breslaw; M G McKenney; E Ginzburg; D Sleeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  Early experience with single-incision laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with mental retardation via a gastrostomy site incision: report of five cases.

Authors:  Masaru Mizuno; Megumi Kobayashi; Akira Sasaki; Jun Nakajima; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Erika Fellinger; William Reed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Hospitalization time after open appendectomy by three different surgical techniques.

Authors:  Agláia Moreira Garcia Ximenes; Fernando Salvo Torres Mello; Zailton Bezerra de Lima-Júnior; Cícero Faustino Ferreira; Amanda Dantas Ferreira Cavalcanti; Adalberto Vieira Dias-Filho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

4.  Laparoscopic assisted two port open appendicectomy.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-07

5.  Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: high-tech low-budget surgery.

Authors:  S Visnjic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-port laparoscopy: Considerations in children.

Authors:  Todd A Ponsky; David M Krpata
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Use of operative laparoscopes in single-port surgery: The forgotten tool.

Authors:  Arjun Khosla; Todd A Ponsky
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Comparison the effect of stump closure by endoclips versus endoloop on the duration of surgery and complications in patients under laparoscopic appendectomy: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Abas Sadat-Safavi; Shirzad Nasiri; Abolfazl Shojaiefard; Mehdi Jafari; Ali Ghorbani Abdehgah; Aidin Yghoobi Notash; Ahmadreza Soroush
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.852

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.