Literature DB >> 8298936

Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy.

C K Kum1, S S Ngoi, P M Goh, Y Tekant, J R Isaac.   

Abstract

A study was carried out of 137 patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis who were randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendicectomy. Patients found to have perforated or normal appendices at histological examination were excluded. Fifty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy and those receiving 57 open procedures were analysed. Laparoscopic appendicectomy took no longer than the open procedure (mean 43 versus 40 min). The number of doses of pethidine (1 mg per kg body-weight) required in the immediate postoperative period did not differ between the two groups but the mean number of doses of oral analgesic (naproxen sodium 550 mg twice daily) required was less in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy (2.8 versus 5.0, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between time to resumption of fluid and diet intake and length of hospital stay. There were five (9 per cent) wound infections after open appendicectomy compared with none after the laparoscopic operation (P < 0.01). Patients who underwent laparoscopy returned to full home (17 versus 30 days, P < 0.01) and social (19 versus 32 days, P < 0.05) activities earlier than those who underwent open operation. Laparoscopic appendicectomy may allow reduction in the number of wound infections and earlier return to normal activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8298936     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800801236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  36 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is a favorable alternative for complicated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Mohammad Saquib Mallick; Aayed Al-Qahtani; Abdulrahman Al-Bassam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  D E Moore; T Speroff; E Grogan; B Poulose; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study.

Authors:  Adnan Aslan; Cagdas Karaveli; Ozlem Elpek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Pelvic abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  F A Frizelle; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy versus open appendicectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcome and cost analysis - Institutional experience.

Authors:  K R Geetha; Annappa Kudva
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.