Literature DB >> 15156331

Increased bone turnover as reflected by biochemical markers in patients with potentially unstable fixation of the tibial component.

Ming G Li1, Kim Thorsen, Kjell G Nilsson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Whether biochemical markers of bone metabolism can be used in assessing the conditions of implant fixation is unknown. In this study, the serum levels of three bone markers were measured prospectively in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to determine if patients with different fixation conditions of the tibial component showed any differences in the levels of the markers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fixation of the tibial component in 40 knees (40 patients, 14 male and 26 female, average age 71 years) was assessed by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and based upon the pattern of migration, implants with stable fixation ( n=25) and potentially unstable fixation ( n=15) were identified. Serum levels of carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP), osteocalcin (OC) and cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) were assessed and compared between the two fixation groups. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively (baseline) and repeated postoperatively at 1 week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: The baseline levels of the markers were statistically the same ( p>0.05) between the two fixation groups. Postoperatively, ICTP levels in the unstable group were significantly higher than in the stable group from 6 to 24 months ( p=0.02). Levels of OC in the unstable group were higher at 12 and 24 months compared with the stable group, reaching statistical significance only at 12 months ( p=0.03). No difference in the levels of PICP was found between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The findings indicate a more active bone turnover probably at the bone-cement/implant interface in knees with potentially unstable fixation. It reveals the potential value for biochemical markers in monitoring implant fixation and aseptic loosening and suggests a possibility for improving implant fixation by drugs which inhibit osteolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15156331     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0695-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  Bone turnover markers correlate with implant fixation in a rat model using LPS-doped particles to induced implant loosening.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Amarjit S Virdi; Kotaro Sena; W Frank Hughes; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Effects of synovial fluid from aseptic prosthesis loosening on collagen production in osteoblasts.

Authors:  Jon A Tsai; Martin K Andersson; Mikael Ivarsson; Barbro Granberg; André Stark
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Discovery of biomarkers to identify peri-implant osteolysis before radiographic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ryan D Ross; Youping Deng; Rui Fang; Nicholas B Frisch; Joshua J Jacobs; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Arthroplasty in veterans: analysis of cartilage, bone, serum, and synovial fluid reveals differences and similarities in osteoarthritis with and without comorbid diabetes.

Authors:  Trevor W Oren; Sergiu Botolin; Allison Williams; Allan Bucknell; Karen B King
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

5.  Multiple biomarkers analysis for the early detection of prosthetic aseptic loosening of hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao He; Wen Wu; Yan Huang; Xiaoling Zhang; Tingting Tang; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Early changes in serum osteocalcin and body weight are predictive of implant fixation in a rat model of implant loosening.

Authors:  Brittany M Wilson; Meghan M Moran; Matthew J Meagher; Ryan D Ross; Maleeha Mashiatulla; Amarjit S Virdi; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Are there biological markers for wear or corrosion? A systematic review.

Authors:  D Rick Sumner; Ryan Ross; Ed Purdue
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Biomarkers in arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marty T Mertens; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-03-16

Review 9.  Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Madanat; Tatu J Mäkinen; Hannu T Aro; Charles Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.