Ryan D Ross1,2, Youping Deng3, Rui Fang3, Nicholas B Frisch2, Joshua J Jacobs2, Dale R Sumner1,2. 1. Department of Cell and Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago 60612, Illinois. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago 60612, Illinois. 3. Department of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu 96813, Hawaii.
Abstract
Peri-implant osteolysis is commonly diagnosed after substantial bone loss has occurred, making revision surgery more challenging. The goal of the current study was to identify urinary biomarkers that differentiate total hip replacement patients who eventually develop osteolysis from patients who do not. We used a repository of 24-h urine samples collected prior to surgery and annually thereafter in 26 patients, 16 who developed osteolysis, and 10 who did not. We examined the markers at radiographic diagnosis, annually for 6 years preceding diagnosis, at the first post-operative sampling point, and pre-operatively. Patients in the osteolysis and non-osteolysis groups were matched according to time post-surgery and did not differ in the male:female ratio or age at surgery. Seven candidate biomarkers were measured, including free deoxypyridinoline (DPD), cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTX), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), osteoprotegerin (OPG), α-crosslaps (α-CTX), and β-crosslaps (β-CTX). As an individual biomarker, DPD demonstrated the highest ability to predict osteolysis, with an area under the curve (AUC) in Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses of 0.844 at 6 years prior to diagnosis. A panel of α-CTX and IL-6 was able to identify at-risk patients with an AUC of 0.941 or greater at all post-operative time points and an AUC of 1.000 pre-operatively. The results demonstrate the potential of using non-invasive biomarkers to identify patients at risk for peri-implant osteolysis long before the emergence of radiographic signs. Further, the high accuracy of the pre-operative biomarker levels demonstrates the potential importance of pre-existing, patient-specific factors driving subsequent osteolysis. Study Design
Peri-implant n class="Disease">osteolysis is commonly diagnosed after substantial bone loss has occurred, making revision surgery more challenging. The goal of the current study was to identify urinary biomarkers that differentiate total hip replacement patients who eventually develop osteolysis from patients who do not. We used a repository of 24-h urine samples collected prior to surgery and annually thereafter in 26 patients, 16 who developed osteolysis, and 10 who did not. We examined the markers at radiographic diagnosis, annually for 6 years preceding diagnosis, at the first post-operative sampling point, and pre-operatively. Patients in the osteolysis and non-osteolysis groups were matched according to time post-surgery and did not differ in the male:female ratio or age at surgery. Seven candidate biomarkers were measured, including free deoxypyridinoline (DPD), cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTX), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), osteoprotegerin (OPG), α-crosslaps (α-CTX), and β-crosslaps (β-CTX). As an individual biomarker, DPD demonstrated the highest ability to predict osteolysis, with an area under the curve (AUC) in Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses of 0.844 at 6 years prior to diagnosis. A panel of α-CTX and IL-6 was able to identify at-risk patients with an AUC of 0.941 or greater at all post-operative time points and an AUC of 1.000 pre-operatively. The results demonstrate the potential of using non-invasive biomarkers to identify patients at risk for peri-implant osteolysis long before the emergence of radiographic signs. Further, the high accuracy of the pre-operative biomarker levels demonstrates the potential importance of pre-existing, patient-specific factors driving subsequent osteolysis. Study Design
Authors: C Anderson Engh; Adam S Stepniewski; Stuart D Ginn; Sarah E Beykirch; Christi J Sychterz-Terefenko; Robert H Hopper; Charles A Engh Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: K Henriksen; D J Leeming; I Byrjalsen; R H Nielsen; M G Sorensen; M H Dziegiel; T John Martin; C Christiansen; P Qvist; M A Karsdal Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Diana J Leeming; Günter Delling; Mitsuru Koizumi; Kim Henriksen; Morten A Karsdal; Bo Li; Per Qvist; László B Tankó; Inger Byrjalsen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Y Nakashima; D H Sun; M C Trindade; W J Maloney; S B Goodman; D J Schurman; R L Smith Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Brittany M Wilson; Meghan M Moran; Matthew J Meagher; Ryan D Ross; Maleeha Mashiatulla; Amarjit S Virdi; Dale R Sumner Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-12-25 Impact factor: 3.494