Literature DB >> 15155015

The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication.

Andrea D Gurmankin1, Jonathan Baron, Katrina Armstrong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the debate about whether numeric statements of risk ought to be included in risk communications.
DESIGN: Subjects (n = 115) completed a questionnaire involving a physician risk communication and 4 scenarios, each of which described a patient with symptoms and signs potentially suggestive of cancer. Each scenario was presented in 3 risk communication versions (a verbal version and 2 numeric versions) in a within-subject 4 x 3 design. Subjects rated their trust in and comfort with the information and their belief that the physician distorted their risk level.
RESULTS: Subjects were significantly more trusting of (t =4.0, P < 0.001) and comfortable with (t =3.4, P = 0.001) the risk information, less likely to believe that the physician minimized the risk in the numeric versions than verbal versions (t =4.3, P < 0.0001), and just as likely to believe that the physician exaggerated the risk in the 2 versions (P = 0.588).
CONCLUSIONS: Including a numeric statement of risk in a risk communication can increase trust and belief in and comfort with the risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15155015     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04265482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  35 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; David Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A combined qualitative method for testing an interactive risk communication tool.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 3.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Ellen Peters; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-05-05

6.  Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Elke U Weber; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Informing, Reassuring, or Alarming? Balancing Patient Needs in the Development of a Postsurgical Symptom Reporting System in Cancer.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Cara Stabile; Jeanne Carter; Ling Y Chen; Daniel Stein; Peter D Stetson; Andrew J Vickers; Brett A Simon; Larissa K Temple; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 8.  Risk assessment models to estimate cancer probabilities.

Authors:  Constance M Johnson; Derek Smolenski
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 10.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Nathan F Dieckmann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.