Literature DB >> 18693789

A combined qualitative method for testing an interactive risk communication tool.

Jessica S Ancker1, Rita Kukafka.   

Abstract

Descriptions of health risks in words, numbers, and graphics can all cause comprehension problems. Our novel risk communication tool involves a game-like interaction to allow users to experience the probability of a health event. The underlying principles are grounded in cognitive theory, but laboratory demonstrations do not guarantee usefulness in the real world. To help us create software on the basis of the theory, we have developed a qualitative method incorporating elements of focus groups and scenario-based usability testing in a community-based participatory research setting in Harlem, NY. In this procedure, a facilitator mediates discussion between software developers and community participants. Using this method, we have elicited guidance from focus groups and found that the interactive game appears to carry an emotional impact that static graphics do not. Additional testing is expected to help develop a useful risk communication tool and lead to richer understanding of lay models of health risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18693789      PMCID: PMC2655853     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  21 in total

Review 1.  The visual communication of risk.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; J G Hollands
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women.

Authors:  T R Schneider; P Salovey; A M Apanovitch; J Pizarro; D McCarthy; J Zullo; A J Rothman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Greg Barron; Elke U Weber; Ido Erev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-08

4.  Testing a visual display to explain small probabilities.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; P M Sandman; W K Hallman
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 5.  Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.

Authors:  B A Israel; A J Schulz; E A Parker; A B Becker
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease.

Authors:  A E Clarke; M K Goldstein; D Michelson; A M Garber; L A Lenert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing.

Authors:  A J Rothman; P Salovey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  High risk or low: how location on a "risk ladder" affects perceived risk.

Authors:  P M Sandman; N D Weinstein; P Miller
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.

Authors:  M M Schapira; A B Nattinger; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Colon cancer: risk perceptions and risk communication.

Authors:  Neil D Weinstein; Kathy Atwood; Elaine Puleo; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb
View more
  5 in total

1.  GetHealthyHarlem.org: developing a web platform for health promotion and wellness driven by and for the Harlem community.

Authors:  Sharib A Khan; Jessica S Ancker; Jianhua Li; David Kaufman; Carly Hutchinson; Alwyn Cohall; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

Review 2.  Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; David Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Jessica S Ancker; Erika Abramson; Vaishali Patel; Rina V Dhopeshwarkar; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Interactive graphics for expressing health risks: development and qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Connie Chan; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Mickael Hiligsmann; Nannan Li; E Michael Lewiecki; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.