Literature DB >> 15154824

CIOMS and ICH initiatives in pharmacovigilance and risk management: overview and implications.

Panos Tsintis1, Edith La Mache.   

Abstract

In this article we review the current initiatives by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) on pharmacovigilance planning that are due for general release during 2004. These initiatives could form the basis for applying concepts of risk management to medicines throughout their life cycle, from preclinical and clinical development to marketed use. The CIOMS VI Working Group (with 28 senior scientists worldwide from drug regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies) is currently developing scientific guidance that relates to clinical trials for medicines during development. It recommends a developmental pharmacovigilance concept - a 'living' concept that would start early in drug development supporting the science and ethics of research leading up to licensing (marketing authorisation) and continuing to post-authorisation (postmarketing) pharmacovigilance. This approach is seen as complementary to current ICH initiatives called 'Pharmacovigilance Planning'. ICH will introduce two concepts in pharmacovigilance management of medicinal products: the 'Pharmacovigilance Specification' and the 'Pharmacovigilance Plan'. The 'Pharmacovigilance Specification' will summarise important knowns and unknowns about the medicine. It will include safety risks identified at the licensing stage, potential risks and any key missing information. These elements will be essential to the formulation of pharmacovigilance plans. Dialogue and common understanding between regulators and the pharmaceutical industry will be a key factor for developing pharmacovigilance plans during the life cycle of medicines. Appropriate interaction with health professionals and patients should also be planned for the future as regulatory systems become more transparent. Where no significant issues are apparent at the licensing (marketing authorisation) stage, routine pharmacovigilance practices will be followed during the marketing phase. Where issues do exist or the data are limited, further study, including epidemiological approaches can be planned. All types of medicines (new drugs, biological agents, orphan drugs) may be involved in these concepts, as would major extensions to existing medicines. Currently ongoing CIOMS and ICH initiatives are in line with emerging risk-management strategies in the US, the European Union and Japan aimed at early and proactive pharmacovigilance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154824     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200427080-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  6 in total

1.  The safety of newly approved medicines: do recent market removals mean there is a problem?

Authors:  M A Friedman; J Woodcock; M M Lumpkin; J E Shuren; A E Hass; L J Thompson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A model for the future conduct of pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Patrick C Waller; Stephen J W Evans
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Regulatory pharmacovigilance in the United Kingdom: current principles and practice.

Authors:  P C Waller; R A Coulson; S M Wood
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  J Lazarou; B H Pomeranz; P N Corey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Liver enzyme monitoring in patients treated with troglitazone.

Authors:  D J Graham; C R Drinkard; D Shatin; Y Tsong; M J Burgess
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Contraindicated use of cisapride: impact of food and drug administration regulatory action.

Authors:  W Smalley; D Shatin; D K Wysowski; J Gurwitz; S E Andrade; M Goodman; K A Chan; R Platt; S D Schech; W A Ray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total
  16 in total

1.  A decade of safety-related regulatory action in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of direct healthcare professional communications from 1999 to 2009.

Authors:  Peter G M Mol; Sabine M J M Straus; Sigrid Piening; Jonie T N de Vries; Pieter A de Graeff; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance during the pre-approval phases: an evolving pharmaceutical industry model in response to ICH E2E, CIOMS VI, FDA and EMEA/CHMP risk-management guidelines.

Authors:  Craig G Hartford; Kasia S Petchel; Hani Mickail; Susana Perez-Gutthann; Mary McHale; John M Grana; Paula Marquez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Use of contemporary antidepressants during breastfeeding: a proposal for a specific safety index.

Authors:  Salvatore Gentile
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  A strategy for regulatory action when new adverse effects of a licensed product emerge.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Deirdre Price; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Bethea A Kleykamp; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Zubin Bhagwagar; Penney Cowan; Christopher Eccleston; Susan S Ellenberg; Scott R Evans; John T Farrar; Roy L Freeman; Louis P Garrison; Jennifer S Gewandter; Veeraindar Goli; Smriti Iyengar; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; Roderick Junor; Nathaniel P Katz; J Patrick Kesslak; Ernest A Kopecky; Dmitri Lissin; John D Markman; Michael P McDermott; Philip J Mease; Alec B O'Connor; Kushang V Patel; Srinivasa N Raja; Michael C Rowbotham; Cristina Sampaio; Jasvinder A Singh; Ilona Steigerwald; Vibeke Strand; Leslie A Tive; Jeffrey Tobias; Ajay D Wasan; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.926

6.  Research Techniques Made Simple: Pharmacoepidemiology Research Methods in Dermatology.

Authors:  Megan H Noe; Joel M Gelfand
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  A modified prescription-event monitoring study to assess the introduction of Seretide Evohaler in England: an example of studying risk monitoring in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Michael J Perrio; Lynda V Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Risk management and outcomes of adverse events to pioglitazone in primary care in the UK: an observational study.

Authors:  Carole Fogg; Rachna Kasliwal; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Adverse drug reactions monitoring: prospects and impending challenges for pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Ram Kumar Sahu; Rajni Yadav; Pushpa Prasad; Amit Roy; Shashikant Chandrakar
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-11-26

10.  Artificial Intelligence, Real-World Automation and the Safety of Medicines.

Authors:  Andrew Bate; Steve F Hobbiger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.