Literature DB >> 10328074

The safety of newly approved medicines: do recent market removals mean there is a problem?

M A Friedman1, J Woodcock, M M Lumpkin, J E Shuren, A E Hass, L J Thompson.   

Abstract

The removal of 5 pharmaceuticals from the market in a 12-month period because of unexpected adverse events raised concerns about the adequacy of the drug review process at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Specifically, concerns were raised about improvements in drug review efficiency that significantly reduced FDA review times. We have reviewed the circumstances of the 5 removals to determine whether there was any relationship to the increased efficiencies in the drug review process. When the removed drugs were analyzed by date of approval, no increase in the number of drugs taken off the market was seen, demonstrating that reduced review processing time was not the reason for the cluster of removals. We conclude that the agency's drug review procedures and postmarketing surveillance system after a drug has been marketed are currently adequate but must continually adjust to future challenges.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328074     DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.18.1728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  37 in total

Review 1.  What can consumer adverse drug reaction reporting add to existing health professional-based systems? Focus on the developing world.

Authors:  Rohini B M Fernandopulle; Krisantha Weerasuriya
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Adverse drug reactions: back to the future.

Authors:  Munir Pirmohamed; B Kevin Park
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Andrew M Wilson; Lehana Thabane; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Knowledge deficits related to the QT interval could affect patient safety.

Authors:  Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Sana M Al-Khatib; Judith M Kramer; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Communication of medical product risk: how effective is effective enough?

Authors:  Stephen A Goldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  CIOMS and ICH initiatives in pharmacovigilance and risk management: overview and implications.

Authors:  Panos Tsintis; Edith La Mache
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Collecting and sharing information about harms.

Authors:  Munir Pirmohamed; Janet Darbyshire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

8.  Drug withdrawals from the Canadian market for safety reasons, 1963-2004.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Detection of adverse drug events and other treatment outcomes using an electronic prescribing system.

Authors:  Tewodros Eguale; Robyn Tamblyn; Nancy Winslade; David Buckeridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Profiling cumulative proportional reporting ratios of drug-induced liver injury in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Authors:  Allen D Brinker; Jenna Lyndly; Joseph Tonning; David Moeny; Jonathan G Levine; Mark I Avigan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.