Literature DB >> 15154564

Waiting for sympatric speciation.

Daniel I Bolnick1.   

Abstract

While it now appears likely that sympatric speciation is possible, its generality remains contentious. If it really is rare, then most natural populations must not fit the assumptions of sympatric speciation theory. A better understanding of these assumptions may help identify when sympatric speciation is or is not likely. This paper investigates two such assumptions: that genetic variation for stringent assortative mating is not limiting and that females are not penalized for mating assortatively. Simulations demonstrate that the speed of sympatric speciation is very sensitive to the population's capacity for stringent assortative mating and is potentially extremely slow. The rapid divergence often thought to be a hallmark of sympatric speciation may only occur in a restricted area of parameter space.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154564     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00421.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Pairing dynamics and the origin of species.

Authors:  Oscar Puebla; Eldredge Bermingham; Frédéric Guichard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Jeremy R Lipkowitz; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Temporally varying disruptive selection in the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis).

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Beausoleil; Luke O Frishkoff; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Sarah A Knutie; Luis F De León; Sarah K Huber; Jaime A Chaves; Dale H Clayton; Jennifer A H Koop; Jeffrey Podos; Diana M T Sharpe; Andrew P Hendry; Rowan D H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Tracking niche variation over millennial timescales in sympatric killer whale lineages.

Authors:  Andrew D Foote; Jason Newton; María C Ávila-Arcos; Marie-Louise Kampmann; Jose A Samaniego; Klaas Post; Aqqalu Rosing-Asvid; Mikkel-Holger S Sinding; M Thomas P Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Origins of shared genetic variation in African cichlids.

Authors:  Yong-Hwee E Loh; Etienne Bezault; Frauke M Muenzel; Reade B Roberts; Ross Swofford; Marta Barluenga; Celeste E Kidd; Aimee E Howe; Federica Di Palma; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Jody Hey; Ole Seehausen; Walter Salzburger; Thomas D Kocher; J Todd Streelman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Franz J Weissing; Pim Edelaar; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  A Simulation Study of the Ecological Speciation Conditions in the Galician Marine Snail Littorina saxatilis.

Authors:  M Fernández-Meirama; E Rolán-Alvarez; A Carvajal-Rodríguez
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Learning to speciate: The biased learning of mate preferences promotes adaptive radiation.

Authors:  R Tucker Gilman; Genevieve M Kozak
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier; Hanna Kokko; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.