Literature DB >> 31795872

Temporally varying disruptive selection in the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis).

Marc-Olivier Beausoleil1, Luke O Frishkoff2, Leithen K M'Gonigle3, Joost A M Raeymaekers4, Sarah A Knutie5, Luis F De León6,7, Sarah K Huber8, Jaime A Chaves9,10, Dale H Clayton11, Jennifer A H Koop12, Jeffrey Podos13, Diana M T Sharpe6, Andrew P Hendry1, Rowan D H Barrett1.   

Abstract

Disruptive natural selection within populations exploiting different resources is considered to be a major driver of adaptive radiation and the production of biodiversity. Fitness functions, which describe the relationships between trait variation and fitness, can help to illuminate how this disruptive selection leads to population differentiation. However, a single fitness function represents only a particular selection regime over a single specified time period (often a single season or a year), and therefore might not capture longer-term dynamics. Here, we build a series of annual fitness functions that quantify the relationships between phenotype and apparent survival. These functions are based on a 9-year mark-recapture dataset of over 600 medium ground finches (Geospiza fortis) within a population bimodal for beak size. We then relate changes in the shape of these functions to climate variables. We find that disruptive selection between small and large beak morphotypes, as reported previously for 2 years, is present throughout the study period, but that the intensity of this selection varies in association with the harshness of environment. In particular, we find that disruptive selection was strongest when precipitation was high during the dry season of the previous year. Our results shed light on climatic factors associated with disruptive selection in Darwin's finches, and highlight the role of temporally varying fitness functions in modulating the extent of population differentiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Darwin's finches; Galápagos; ecological speciation; fitness function; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795872      PMCID: PMC6939253          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  42 in total

1.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation.

Authors:  U Dieckmann; M Doebeli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Authors:  S J Arnold; M E Pfrender; A G Jones
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Experimental excursions on adaptive landscapes: density-dependent selection on egg size.

Authors:  E Svensson; B Sinervo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Causes of lifetime fitness of Darwin's finches in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Precipitation drives global variation in natural selection.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Michael B Morrissey; Mathieu Buoro; Stephanie M Carlson; Christina M Caruso; Sonya M Clegg; Tim Coulson; Joseph DiBattista; Kiyoko M Gotanda; Clinton D Francis; Joe Hereford; Joel G Kingsolver; Kate E Augustine; Loeske E B Kruuk; Ryan A Martin; Ben C Sheldon; Nina Sletvold; Erik I Svensson; Michael J Wade; Andrew D C MacColl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  ESTIMATING THE FORM OF NATURAL SELECTION ON A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Multiple fitness peaks on the adaptive landscape drive adaptive radiation in the wild.

Authors:  Christopher H Martin; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Thomas J Farrugia; Michael T Kinnison
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hybridization alters the shape of the genotypic fitness landscape, increasing access to novel fitness peaks during adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Austin H Patton; Emilie J Richards; Katelyn J Gould; Logan K Buie; Christopher H Martin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Temporally varying disruptive selection in the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis).

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Beausoleil; Luke O Frishkoff; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Sarah A Knutie; Luis F De León; Sarah K Huber; Jaime A Chaves; Dale H Clayton; Jennifer A H Koop; Jeffrey Podos; Diana M T Sharpe; Andrew P Hendry; Rowan D H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Where did the finch go? Insights from radio telemetry of the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis).

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Beausoleil; Carlos Camacho; Julio Rabadán-González; Kristen Lalla; Roxanne Richard; Paola Carrion-Avilés; Andrew P Hendry; Rowan D H Barrett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Morphological ghosts of introgression in Darwin's finch populations.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.