Literature DB >> 15153302

Saccharomyces genome database: underlying principles and organisation.

Selina S Dwight1, Rama Balakrishnan, Karen R Christie, Maria C Costanzo, Kara Dolinski, Stacia R Engel, Becket Feierbach, Dianna G Fisk, Jodi Hirschman, Eurie L Hong, Laurie Issel-Tarver, Robert S Nash, Anand Sethuraman, Barry Starr, Chandra L Theesfeld, Rey Andrada, Gail Binkley, Qing Dong, Christopher Lane, Mark Schroeder, Shuai Weng, David Botstein, J Michael Cherry.   

Abstract

A scientific database can be a powerful tool for biologists in an era where large-scale genomic analysis, combined with smaller-scale scientific results, provides new insights into the roles of genes and their products in the cell. However, the collection and assimilation of data is, in itself, not enough to make a database useful. The data must be incorporated into the database and presented to the user in an intuitive and biologically significant manner. Most importantly, this presentation must be driven by the user's point of view; that is, from a biological perspective. The success of a scientific database can therefore be measured by the response of its users - statistically, by usage numbers and, in a less quantifiable way, by its relationship with the community it serves and its ability to serve as a model for similar projects. Since its inception ten years ago, the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) has seen a dramatic increase in its usage, has developed and maintained a positive working relationship with the yeast research community, and has served as a template for at least one other database. The success of SGD, as measured by these criteria, is due in large part to philosophies that have guided its mission and organisation since it was established in 1993. This paper aims to detail these philosophies and how they shape the organisation and presentation of the database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15153302      PMCID: PMC3037832          DOI: 10.1093/bib/5.1.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  5 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting.

Authors:  Paul Cliften; Priya Sudarsanam; Ashwin Desikan; Lucinda Fulton; Bob Fulton; John Majors; Robert Waterston; Barak A Cohen; Mark Johnston
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements.

Authors:  Manolis Kellis; Nick Patterson; Matthew Endrizzi; Bruce Birren; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Prm1p, a pheromone-regulated multispanning membrane protein, facilitates plasma membrane fusion during yeast mating.

Authors:  M G Heiman; P Walter
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  Reinvestigation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome annotation by comparison to the genome of a related fungus: Ashbya gossypii.

Authors:  Sophie Brachat; Fred S Dietrich; Sylvia Voegeli; Zhihong Zhang; Larissa Stuart; Anita Lerch; Krista Gates; Tom Gaffney; Peter Philippsen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 13.583

  5 in total
  41 in total

Review 1.  Sustainable digital infrastructure. Although databases and other online resources have become a central tool for biological research, their long-term support and maintenance is far from secure.

Authors:  Ruth Bastow; Sabina Leonelli
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Genome-wide regulatory complexity in yeast promoters: separation of functionally conserved and neutral sequence.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; Jeffrey H Chuang; Hao Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A data integration methodology for systems biology: experimental verification.

Authors:  Daehee Hwang; Jennifer J Smith; Deena M Leslie; Andrea D Weston; Alistair G Rust; Stephen Ramsey; Pedro de Atauri; Andrew F Siegel; Hamid Bolouri; John D Aitchison; Leroy Hood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transcriptional compensation for gene loss plays a minor role in maintaining genetic robustness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sharyl L Wong; Frederick P Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  New bioinformatic tools for analysis of nucleotide modifications in eukaryotic rRNA.

Authors:  Dorota Piekna-Przybylska; Wayne A Decatur; Maurille J Fournier
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  GSE: a comprehensive database system for the representation, retrieval, and analysis of microarray data.

Authors:  Timothy Danford; Alex Rolfe; David Gifford
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2008

7.  A MOD(ern) perspective on literature curation.

Authors:  Jodi Hirschman; Tanya Z Berardini; Harold J Drabkin; Doug Howe
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  A general co-expression network-based approach to gene expression analysis: comparison and applications.

Authors:  Jianhua Ruan; Angela K Dean; Weixiong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-02-02

9.  Using GeneReg to construct time delay gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Tao Huang; Lei Liu; Ziliang Qian; Kang Tu; Yixue Li; Lu Xie
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-05-25

10.  The Protein Naming Utility: a rules database for protein nomenclature.

Authors:  Johannes Goll; Robert Montgomery; Lauren M Brinkac; Seth Schobel; Derek M Harkins; Yinong Sebastian; Susmita Shrivastava; Scott Durkin; Granger Sutton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.