Literature DB >> 26792439

Ethics: An Indispensable Dimension in the University Rankings.

Ali Khaki Sedigh1.   

Abstract

University ranking systems attempt to provide an ordinal gauge to make an expert evaluation of the university's performance for a general audience. University rankings have always had their pros and cons in the higher education community. Some seriously question the usefulness, accuracy, and lack of consensus in ranking systems and therefore multidimensional ranking systems have been proposed to overcome some shortcomings of the earlier systems. Although the present ranking results may rather be rough, they are the only available sources that illustrate the complex university performance in a tangible format. Their relative accuracy has turned the ranking systems into an essential feature of the academic lifecycle within the foreseeable future. The main concern however, is that the present ranking systems totally neglect the ethical issues involved in university performances. Ethics should be a new dimension added into the university ranking systems, as it is an undisputable right of the public and all the parties involved in higher education to have an ethical evaluation of the university's achievements. In this paper, to initiate ethical assessment and rankings, the main factors involved in the university performances are reviewed from an ethical perspective. Finally, a basic benchmarking model for university ethical performance is presented.

Keywords:  Ethical indicators; Ethical performance; Ethical ranking model; University ranking

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26792439     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9758-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  4 in total

Review 1.  Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Kenneth D Pimple
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Trevor S Harding; Donald D Carpenter; Cynthia J Finelli; Honor J Passow
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Saudi university policy: overvalued rankings.

Authors:  George Miley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Patterns of text reuse in a scientific corpus.

Authors:  Daniel T Citron; Paul Ginsparg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  How can Ethics be Considered as a Criterion for Universities Ranking?

Authors:  Zohrehsadat Naji; Payman Salamati
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.