Literature DB >> 22278656

The functions of the fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior drawer, rotational laxity and the pivot shift.

Andrew A Amis1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which has a parallel array of collagen fascicles that have usually been divided into two 'fibre bundles': anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL), according to their tibial attachment sites. The PL bundle has shorter fibres, and so it is subjected to greater tensile strains than the AM bundle when the whole ACL is stretched; its oblique orientation in the coronal plane imbues it with greater ability to resist tibial rotation than the more vertical AM fibre bundle. Most studies have found that the AM bundle is close to isometric when the knee flexes, while the PL bundle slackens approximately 6 mm. There is little evidence of significant fibre bundle elongation in response to tibial rotation. Selective bundle cutting studies have been performed, allowing both the bundle tensions and their contributions to resisting tibial anterior translation and tibial rotation to be calculated. These show that the function of the PL bundle was dominant near knee extension in some studies, particularly when resisting anterior drawer and that its contribution reduced rapidly with knee flexion through 30 degrees. There has been little study of the contributions of the fibre bundles in control of tibial internal-external rotation or the pivot shift: one study found that the AM bundle had larger tensions than the PL bundle during a simulated pivot shift, but another study found that cutting the PL bundle allowed a larger increase in coupled tibial anterior translation than cutting the AM bundle. It was concluded that the AM bundle is most important for resisting tibial anterior drawer-the primary function of the ACL-while the PL bundle is tight near knee extension, when it has a role in control of tibial rotational laxity. There is a clear need for further study of dynamic knee instability, to gain better understanding of how best to reconstruct the ACL and associated tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278656     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1864-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  51 in total

1.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Simultaneous measurement of changes in length of the cruciate ligaments during knee motion.

Authors:  H Kurosawa; K Yamakoshi; K Yasuda; T Sasaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  2D and 3D 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the double bundle structure in anterior cruciate ligament anatomy.

Authors:  Hanno Steckel; Gianluca Vadala; Denise Davis; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Assessment of the "functional length" of the three bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Takehiko Iwahashi; Konsei Shino; Ken Nakata; Norimasa Nakamura; Yuzou Yamada; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; James E Voos; Fintan J Shannon; Carinne C Granchi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  A A Sapega; R A Moyer; C Schneck; N Komalahiranya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a doubled tendon graft.

Authors:  B Zaricznyj
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Rotational instability of the knee: internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test.

Authors:  Nadine Diermann; Tobias Schumacher; Steffen Schanz; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  A M J Bull; P H Earnshaw; A Smith; M V Katchburian; A N A Hassan; A A Amis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-09

10.  Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Chong Bum Chang; Yoon Keun Park; Hyunchul Jo; Choong Hyun Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  30 in total

1.  The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Allan Larsen; Per Arne Waaler; Torbjørn Strand; Thomas Harlem; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Cara Vernacchia; Eric Thorhauer; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Is the femoral lateral condyle's bone morphology the trochlea of the ACL?

Authors:  Margarida Sá Fernandes; Rogério Pereira; Renato Andrade; Sebastiano Vasta; Hélder Pereira; João Páscoa Pinheiro; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of outcome after anatomic double-bundle and antero-medial portal non-anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in ACL-injured patients.

Authors:  Ioannis Karikis; Mattias Ahldén; Abraham Casut; Ninni Sernert; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Crimp morphology in the ovine anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Ashvin Thambyah; Neil Broom
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Clinical outcomes and biomechanical analysis of posterolateral bundle augmentation in patients with partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Daisuke Araki; Yuichi Hoshino; Kanto Nagai; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Surgical treatment of partial anterior cruciate ligament lesions: medium-term results.

Authors:  Massimo Berruto; Luca Gala; Paolo Ferrua; Francesco Uboldi; Fabrizio Ferrara; Stefano Pasqualotto; Bruno M Marelli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-02-13

Review 8.  ACL Injury Prevention: What Does Research Tell Us?

Authors:  Trent Nessler; Linda Denney; Justin Sampley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

9.  Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Combined with Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Man Qiu; Aiguo Zhou; Jian Zhang; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 10.  Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of literature.

Authors:  Piia Suomalainen; Pekka Kannus; Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.