Literature DB >> 15149986

Whole-body 3D MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Christoph U Herborn1, Mathias Goyen, Harald H Quick, Silke Bosk, Sandra Massing, Knut Kroeger, Dirk Stoesser, Stefan G Ruehm, Jörg F Debatin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the diagnostic performance of whole-body 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-one patients with clinically documented peripheral arterial occlusive disease referred for DSA of the lower extremity arterial system underwent whole-body MR angiography on a 1.5-T MR scanner. Paramagnetic gadobutrol was administered and five contiguous stations were acquired with 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences in a total scanning time of 72 sec. DSA was available as a reference standard for the peripheral vasculature in all patients. Separate blinded data analyses were performed by two radiologists. Additional vascular disease detected by whole-body MR angiography was subsequently assessed on sonography, dedicated MR angiography, or both.
RESULTS: All whole-body MR angiography examinations were feasible and well tolerated. AngioSURF-based whole-body MR angiography had overall sensitivities of 92.3% and 93.1% (both 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 78-100%) with specificities of 89.2% and 87.6% (both CIs, 84-98%) and excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.82) for the detection of high-grade stenoses. Additional vascular disease was detected in 12 patients (23%).
CONCLUSION: Whole-body MR angiography permits a rapid, noninvasive, and accurate evaluation of the lower peripheral arterial system in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and it may allow identification of additional relevant vascular disease that was previously undetected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15149986     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  23 in total

1.  [Cardiovascular whole-body MRI: possibilities and limitations in prevention].

Authors:  C U Herborn; F M Vogt; M Goyen; S C Goehde; S G Ruehm; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Whole-body three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with parallel imaging techniques on a multichannel MR system for the detection of various systemic arterial diseases.

Authors:  Jiang Lin; Bin Chen; Jian-Hua Wang; Meng-Su Zeng; Yi-Xiang Wang
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  [Whole body MRI--diagnostic strategy of the future?].

Authors:  M Goyen; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Victor A Ferrari; Corey Goldman; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John P Reilly; George P Rodgers; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 5.  Whole-Body MRA.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Harald H Quick; Bernd Tombach; Stefan O Schoenberg; Joerg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Evaluation of various image reconstruction parameters in lower extremity stents using multidetector-row CT angiography: initial findings.

Authors:  Martin Heuschmid; Benjamin Wiesinger; Gunnar Tepe; Oliver Luz; Andreas F Kopp; Claus D Claussen; Stephan H Duda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  [Whole-body MRI in comparison to skeletal scintigraphy for detection of skeletal metastases in patients with solid tumors].

Authors:  N Ghanem; T Kelly; C Altehoefer; J Winterer; O Schäfer; T A Bley; E Moser; M Langer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  A total atherosclerotic score for whole-body MRA and its relation to traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  T Hansen; H Ahlström; J Wikström; L Lind; L Johansson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Comparison between a linear versus a macrocyclic contrast agent for whole body MR angiography in a clinical routine setting.

Authors:  Achim Seeger; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Florian Grimm; Christiane Bretschneider; Jörg Döring; Bernhard Klumpp; Gunnar Tepe; Kilian Rittig; Peter R Seidensticker; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Prediction of coronary artery disease by a systemic atherosclerosis score index derived from whole-body MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephanie Lehrke; Benjamin Egenlauf; Henning Steen; Dirk Lossnitzer; Grigorius Korosoglou; Constanze Merten; Boris T Ivandic; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.