Literature DB >> 15148648

The direct closure of the internal fistula opening without advancement flap for transsphincteric fistulas-in-ano.

Sotirios Athanasiadis1, Christian Helmes, Rayan Yazigi, Andreas Köhler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The recommended closure techniques for transsphincteric fistulas demonstrate divergent results for postoperative continence and recurrence rates. An incontinence rate of 35 percent and a recurrence rate of up to 54 percent has been reported after transanal advancement techniques. The authors hypothesize that a direct closure of the internal fistula opening without tissue mobilization is easier to facilitate and generally leads to better clinical and functional results.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study between 1995 and 1999 was undertaken in 90 patients with transsphincteric fistulas. A direct closure of the internal fistula opening without a flap was performed in all patients. A three-layer, nonstaggered closure of mucosa, submucosa, internal, and external anal sphincters was performed. The follow-up time periods ranged from one-half to six (median, 2.6) years and included assessment of fistula recurrence and continence using patients' histories, physical examinations, proctoscopy, and continence scores. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test or chi-squared test.
RESULTS: Data from 90 patients with a total of 106 operations were analyzed (65 males and 41 females; average age 46 (range, 22-78) years). Sixty-six patients had previous anorectal abscess surgery, and 41 had a previous fistula operation. The mean number of previous fistula operations was 1.7. All patients were continent before surgery. Mean elapsed operative time period was 37 +/- 11 minutes, and the mean anal retraction time was 20 +/- 7 minutes. Suture line dehiscence was the main postoperative complication. It was found to occur between the fourth and tenth postoperative days in 15 patients (14 percent). In 12 of 15 patients (80 percent), the fistula persisted and operative treatment was necessary. In three patients (20 percent), spontaneous closure took place. A recurrent fistula after wound healing was observed in seven patients (6.6 percent). The risk of developing a suture line dehiscence leading to a persistent fistula or a recurrent fistula was 22.5 percent. Ninety-four percent of the patients were continent (continence score 0), 6 percent had a minimal disorder of continence (score 4). A continence level for all patients was determined by the international classification of continence disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct closure for the treatment of transsphincteric fistulas is a safe and effective approach and achieves a good functional outcome; a small risk of suture line dehiscence, which may lead to a recurrent or persistent fistula, remains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148648     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0551-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: a consensus statement developed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Authors:  A Amato; C Bottini; P De Nardi; P Giamundo; A Lauretta; A Realis Luc; G Tegon; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Combined partial fistulectomy and electro-cauterization of the intersphincteric tract as a sphincter-sparing treatment of complex anal fistula: clinical and functional outcome.

Authors:  A A Shafik; O El Sibai; I A Shafik
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Recovery rates and functional results after repair for rectovaginal fistula in Crohn's disease: a comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  Sotirios Athanasiadis; Rayan Yazigi; Andreas Köhler; Christian Helmes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; F Salis; G Lisi; I Ciangola; G Milito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Does laser fistuloplasty (FiLaC™) offer any benefit over surgical closure of the internal orifice?

Authors:  J Stijns; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement.

Authors:  A Amato; C Bottini; P De Nardi; P Giamundo; A Lauretta; A Realis Luc; V Piloni
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  German S3 guidelines: anal abscess and fistula (second revised version).

Authors:  Andreas Ommer; Alexander Herold; Eugen Berg; Alois Fürst; Stefan Post; Reinhard Ruppert; Thomas Schiedeck; Oliver Schwandner; Bernhard Strittmatter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Non-sphincter splitting fistulectomy vs conventional fistulotomy for high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective functional and manometric study.

Authors:  Takayuki Toyonaga; Makoto Matsushima; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kazunori Suzuki; Nobuhito Sogawa; Hiroki Kanyama; Yasuhiro Shimojima; Tomoaki Hatakeyama; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  [Fistulas and fissures. Part I: perianal fistulas].

Authors:  W Heitland
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  The use of a staged drainage seton for the treatment of anal fistulae or fistulous abscesses.

Authors:  Cheong Ho Lim; Hyeon Keun Shin; Wook Ho Kang; Chan Ho Park; Sa Min Hong; Seung Kyu Jeong; June Young Kim; Hyung Kyu Yang
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.