Literature DB >> 17294195

Non-sphincter splitting fistulectomy vs conventional fistulotomy for high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective functional and manometric study.

Takayuki Toyonaga1, Makoto Matsushima, Yoshiaki Tanaka, Kazunori Suzuki, Nobuhito Sogawa, Hiroki Kanyama, Yasuhiro Shimojima, Tomoaki Hatakeyama, Masao Tanaka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the clinical and physiological results of non-sphincter splitting fistulectomy (N-SSF) with those of sphincter splitting fistulotomy (SSF) for treatment of high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was undertaken in 70 consecutive patients with high trans-sphincteric fistula treated by SSF (n = 35) or N-SSF (n = 35). Anal manometry was performed before and 3 months after surgery. Anal continence was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in age, gender, presence of horseshoe extension, preoperative incontinence score and manometric values. The incidence of recurrence was similar between the two groups. The postoperative incontinence score of the SSF group was significantly higher than that of the N-SSF group (1.9 +/- 2.9 vs 1.1 +/- 2.9, P = 0.0347). Maximum resting pressure showed significant decrease after surgery in both groups (83.2 to 56.1 mmHg, P = 0.0001 and 85.1 to 58.4 mmHg, P = 0.0001). Voluntary contraction pressure and functional anal canal length did not change after N-SSF (137.6 to 138.2 mmHg, P = 0.9524 and 4.06 to 4.07 cm, P = 0.9524), but significantly decreased after SSF (120.2 to 96.7 mmHg, P = 0.0085 and 4.12 to 3.74 cm, P = 0.0183).
CONCLUSION: Non-sphincter splitting fistulectomy for high trans-sphincteric fistula provided better functional results than fistulotomy. Less impairment of anal continence was achieved possibly not only by maintenance of the external anal sphincter function but also by preservation of the length of the high-pressure zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17294195     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0288-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Functional results after transanal rectal advancement flap repair of trans-sphincteric fistula.

Authors:  M E Kreis; E C Jehle; M Ohlemann; H D Becker; M J Starlinger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Influence of Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures.

Authors:  W F van Tets; J H Kuijpers; K Tran; R Mollen; H van Goor
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Excision of anal fistula with closure of the internal opening: functional and manometric results.

Authors:  Ulla-Maria Gustafsson; Wilhelm Graf
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Clinical results and manometric studies after rectal flap advancement for infra-levator trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  W G Lewis; P J Finan; P J Holdsworth; P M Sagar; B M Stephenson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence.

Authors:  J Garcia-Aguilar; C Belmonte; W D Wong; S M Goldberg; R D Madoff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high trans-sphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas.

Authors:  H Ortíz; J Marzo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Mucosal advancement in the treatment of anal fistula.

Authors:  P S Aguilar; G Plasencia; T G Hardy; R F Hartmann; W R Stewart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy.

Authors:  W F van Tets; H C Kuijpers
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula.

Authors:  P J Lunniss; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of accuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronic anal fistula.

Authors:  T Toyonaga; Y Tanaka; J F Song; R Katori; N Sogawa; H Kanyama; T Hatakeyama; M Matsushima; S Suzuki; R Mibu; M Tanaka
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Cryptoglandular anal fistulas.

Authors:  Andreas Ommer; Alexander Herold; Eugen Berg; Alois Fürst; Marco Sailer; Thomas Schiedeck
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing fistulectomy versus fistulotomy for low anal fistula.

Authors:  Yansong Xu; Siyuang Liang; Weizhong Tang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.