Literature DB >> 15145810

A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.

J G Liao1, Yong Lin, Zachariah E Selvanayagam, Weichung Joe Shih.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Statistical methods based on controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) or positive false discovery rate (pFDR) are now well established in identifying differentially expressed genes in DNA microarray. Several authors have recently raised the important issue that FDR or pFDR may give misleading inference when specific genes are of interest because they average the genes under consideration with genes that show stronger evidence for differential expression. The paper proposes a flexible and robust mixture model for estimating the local FDR which quantifies how plausible each specific gene expresses differentially.
RESULTS: We develop a special mixture model tailored to multiple testing by requiring the P-value distribution for the differentially expressed genes to be stochastically smaller than the P-value distribution for the non-differentially expressed genes. A smoothing mechanism is built in. The proposed model gives robust estimation of local FDR for any reasonable underlying P-value distributions. It also provides a single framework for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes, pFDR, negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity. A cervical cancer study shows that the local FDR gives more specific and relevant quantification of the evidence for differential expression that can be substantially different from pFDR. AVAILABILITY: An R function implementing the proposed model is available at http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao/software

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145810     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  26 in total

1.  Estimating the posterior probability that genome-wide association findings are true or false.

Authors:  József Bukszár; Joseph L McClay; Edwin J C G van den Oord
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Anastasios Markitsis; Yinglei Lai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A robust method for large-scale multiple hypotheses testing.

Authors:  Seungbong Han; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Kam-Wah Tsui
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Illustrations on Using the Distribution of a P-value in High Dimensional Data Analyses.

Authors:  Xiaojun Hu; Gary L Gadbury; Qinfang Xiang; David B Allison
Journal:  Adv Appl Stat Sci       Date:  2010-02

5.  AAPL: Assessing Association between P-value Lists.

Authors:  Tianwei Yu; Yize Zhao; Shihao Shen
Journal:  Stat Anal Data Min       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Assumption Adequacy Averaging as a Concept to Develop More Robust Methods for Differential Gene Expression Analysis.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Shesh N Rai
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  A mixture model approach for the analysis of small exploratory microarray experiments.

Authors:  W M Muir; G J M Rosa; B R Pittendrigh; S Xu; S D Rider; M Fountain; J Ogas
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Multifactor dimensionality reduction-phenomics: a novel method to capture genetic heterogeneity with use of phenotypic variables.

Authors:  H Mei; M L Cuccaro; E R Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Empirical Bayes analysis of quantitative proteomics experiments.

Authors:  Adam A Margolin; Shao-En Ong; Monica Schenone; Robert Gould; Stuart L Schreiber; Steven A Carr; Todd R Golub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Local false discovery rate facilitates comparison of different microarray experiments.

Authors:  Wan-Jen Hong; Robert Tibshirani; Gilbert Chu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.