Literature DB >> 20391535

A robust method for large-scale multiple hypotheses testing.

Seungbong Han1, Adin-Cristian Andrei, Kam-Wah Tsui.   

Abstract

When drawing large-scale simultaneous inference, such as in genomics and imaging problems, multiplicity adjustments should be made, since, otherwise, one would be faced with an inflated type I error. Numerous methods are available to estimate the proportion of true null hypotheses pi(0), among a large number of hypotheses tested. Many methods implicitly assume that the pi(0) is large, that is, close to 1. However, in practice, mid-range pi(0) values are frequently encountered and many of the widely used methods tend to produce highly variable or biased estimates of pi(0). As a remedy in such situations, we propose a hierarchical Bayesian model that produces an estimator of pi(0) that exhibits considerably less bias and is more stable. Simulation studies seem indicative of good method performance even when low-to-moderate correlation exists among test statistics. Method performance is assessed in simulated settings and its practical usefulness is illustrated in an application to a type II diabetes study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20391535      PMCID: PMC3960085          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200900177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  11 in total

1.  Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Stephan W Morris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method.

Authors:  Michael A Newton; Amine Noueiry; Deepayan Sarkar; Paul Ahlquist
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Improving false discovery rate estimation.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Cheng Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Stan Pounds; Cheng Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Bayesian models based on test statistics for multiple hypothesis testing problems.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Identifying important results from multiple statistical tests.

Authors:  R A Parker; R B Rothenberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A gene expression network model of type 2 diabetes links cell cycle regulation in islets with diabetes susceptibility.

Authors:  Mark P Keller; YounJeong Choi; Ping Wang; Dawn Belt Davis; Mary E Rabaglia; Angie T Oler; Donald S Stapleton; Carmen Argmann; Kathy L Schueler; Steve Edwards; H Adam Steinberg; Elias Chaibub Neto; Robert Kleinhanz; Scott Turner; Marc K Hellerstein; Eric E Schadt; Brian S Yandell; Christina Kendziorski; Alan D Attie
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Assessing stability of gene selection in microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Xing Qiu; Yuanhui Xiao; Alexander Gordon; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A genome-wide gene expression signature of environmental geography in leukocytes of Moroccan Amazighs.

Authors:  Youssef Idaghdour; John D Storey; Sami J Jadallah; Greg Gibson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.