Literature DB >> 15144069

Maximizing genetic gain over multiple generations with quantitative trait locus selection and control of inbreeding.

B Villanueva1, J C M Dekkers, J A Woolliams, P Settar.   

Abstract

Stochastic computer simulation was used to investigate the potential extra genetic gains obtained from gene-assisted selection (GAS) by combining 1) optimization of genetic contributions for maximizing gain, while restricting the rate of inbreeding with 2) optimization of the relative emphasis given to the QTL over generations. The genetic model assumed implied a mixed inheritance model in which a single quantitative trait locus (i.e., QTL) is segregating together with polygenes. When compared with standard GAS (i.e., fixed contributions and equal emphasis on the QTL and polygenic EBV), combined optimization of contributions of selection candidates and weights on the QTL across generations allowed substantial increases in gain at a fixed rate of inbreeding and avoided the conflict between short- and long-term responses in GAS schemes. Most of the increase of gain was produced by optimization of selection candidates' contributions. Optimization of the relative emphasis given to the QTL over generations had, however, a greater effect on avoiding the long-term loss usually observed in GAS schemes. Optimized contribution schemes led to lower gametic phase disequilibrium between the QTL and polygenes and to higher selection intensities both on the QTL and polygenes than with standard truncation selection with fixed contributions of selection candidates.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15144069     DOI: 10.2527/2004.8251305x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection.

Authors:  Nanye Long; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of the effect and profitability of gene-assisted selection in pig breeding system.

Authors:  Ya-Lan Li; Qin Zhang; Yao-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods.

Authors:  M Heidaritabar; A Vereijken; W M Muir; T Meuwissen; H Cheng; H-J Megens; M A M Groenen; J W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

5. 

Authors:  G Tang; P Lin; C Xu; J Xue; T Liu; Z Wang; X Li
Journal:  Livest Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.943

6.  Transcriptional responses of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) to low temperature.

Authors:  Jinwei Hu; Feng You; Qian Wang; Shenda Weng; Hui Liu; Lijuan Wang; Pei-Jun Zhang; Xungang Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Upweighting rare favourable alleles increases long-term genetic gain in genomic selection programs.

Authors:  Huiming Liu; Theo H E Meuwissen; Anders C Sørensen; Peer Berg
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Identification of SNPs associated with muscle yield and quality traits using allelic-imbalance analyses of pooled RNA-Seq samples in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Rafet Al-Tobasei; Ali Ali; Timothy D Leeds; Sixin Liu; Yniv Palti; Brett Kenney; Mohamed Salem
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  RNA-Seq identifies SNP markers for growth traits in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Mohamed Salem; Roger L Vallejo; Timothy D Leeds; Yniv Palti; Sixin Liu; Annas Sabbagh; Caird E Rexroad; Jianbo Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.