Literature DB >> 15143765

[Current developments in cochlear implantation].

R Laszig1, A Aschendorff, J Schipper, T Klenzner.   

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, cochlear implantation has become a well accepted treatment in patients suffering from hearing loss or congenital deafness. Results have been impressive,and indications for a cochlear implant have been extended continuously. Thanks to a sophisticated diagnostic procedure, optimization of the surgical technique, and the progression of interdisciplinary cooperation in the field of rehabilitation, the acceptance of cochlear implantation is growing significantly. The manufacturers of the devices are making great efforts to miniaturize the external components of the system, and new developments in electrode arrays, combined with new speech coding strategies, result in better speech understanding. The new developments in electrode design, however, are not necessarily improvements over recent years. Nevertheless, a very well functioning network of physicians, scientists, and manufacturers has acted and reacted in an outstanding manner to identify possible causes of post-implantation meningitis, have taken immediate counter measures and presented possibilities of prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15143765     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1049-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  24 in total

1.  Nondestructive three-dimensional analysis of electrode to modiolus proximity.

Authors:  Hartmut W Husstedt; Antje Aschendorff; Bernhard Richter; Roland Laszig; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Ultracision: an alternative to electrocautery in revision cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Roland Laszig; Gerd Jürgen Ridder; Antje Aschendorff; Milo Fradis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  W K Gstoettner; O Adunka; P Franz; J Hamzavi; H Plenk; M Susani; W Baumgartner; J Kiefer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  The suprameatal approach in cochlear implant surgery: our experience with 80 patients.

Authors:  Jona Kronenberg; Lela Migirov; Wolf Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Clarion 1.2 standard electrode array with partial space-filling positioner: radiological and histological evaluation in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Bernhard Richter; Antje Aschendorff; Petra Lohnstein; Hartmut Husstedt; Heiner Nagursky; Roland Laszig
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique.

Authors:  R Häusler
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Speech recognition in children with hearing aids versus results in children with implants.

Authors:  E Löhle; U Falley; R Laszig
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Outcome of cochlear implantation at different ages from 0 to 6 years.

Authors:  Paul J Govaerts; Carina De Beukelaer; Kristin Daemers; Geert De Ceulaer; Marjan Yperman; Thomas Somers; Isabelle Schatteman; F Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Cochlear implantation after bacterial meningitis: the dangers of delay.

Authors:  A Dodds; E Tyszkiewicz; R Ramsden
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Pneumococcal vaccination for cochlear implant candidates and recipients: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  8 in total

1.  Determination of the curling behavior of a preformed cochlear implant electrode array.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Andreas Hussong; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  [A multicentre comparative study of the ESPrit and the Nucleus 22].

Authors:  K Berger; H Bagus; H Michels; J Roth; B Voss; T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].

Authors:  J Müller; J Helms
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].

Authors:  H Meister; D Tepeli; P Wagner; W Hess; M Walger; H von Wedel; R Lang-Roth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Bilateral cochlear implants].

Authors:  J Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S Haumann; R Mühler; M Ziese; H von Specht
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Cochlear implantation: a changing indication].

Authors:  T Stark; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.