Literature DB >> 15142407

Multi-modality imaging identifies key times for annexin V imaging as an early predictor of therapeutic outcome.

Stefanie J Mandl1, Carina Mari, Matthias Edinger, Robert S Negrin, Jonathan F Tait, Christopher H Contag, Francis G Blankenberg.   

Abstract

Radiolabeled annexin V may provide an early indication of the success or failure of anticancer therapy on a patient-by-patient basis as an in vivo marker of tumor cell killing. An important question that remains is when, after initiation of treatment, should annexin V imaging be performed. To address this issue, we obtained simultaneous in vivo measurements of tumor burden and uptake of radiolabeled annexin V in the syngeneic orthotopic murine BCL1 lymphoma model using in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and small animal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). BCL1 cells labeled for fluorescence and bioluminescence assays (BCL1-gfp/luc) were injected into mice at a dose that leads to progressive disease within two to three weeks. Tumor response was followed by BLI and SPECT before and after treatment with a single dose of 10 mg/kg doxorubicin. Biodistribution analyses revealed a biphasic increase of annexin V uptake within the tumor-bearing tissues of mice. An early peak occurring before actual tumor cells loss was observed between 1 and 5 hr after treatment, and a second longer sustained rise from 9 to 24 hr after therapy, which heralds the onset of tumor cell loss as confirmed by BLI. Multimodality imaging revealed the temporal patterns of tumor cell loss and annexin V uptake revealing a better understanding of the timing of radiolabeled annexin V uptake for its development as a marker of therapeutic efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15142407     DOI: 10.1162/153535004773861679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1535-3508            Impact factor:   4.488


  9 in total

1.  Cancer stem cells from human breast tumors are involved in spontaneous metastases in orthotopic mouse models.

Authors:  Huiping Liu; Manishkumar R Patel; Jennifer A Prescher; Antonia Patsialou; Dalong Qian; Jiahui Lin; Susanna Wen; Ya-Fang Chang; Michael H Bachmann; Yohei Shimono; Piero Dalerba; Maddalena Adorno; Neethan Lobo; Janet Bueno; Frederick M Dirbas; Sumanta Goswami; George Somlo; John Condeelis; Christopher H Contag; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measuring response to therapy by near-infrared imaging of tumors using a phosphatidylserine-targeting antibody fragment.

Authors:  Jian Gong; Richard Archer; Michael Brown; Seth Fisher; Connie Chang; Matthew Peacock; Christopher Hughes; Bruce Freimark
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  In vitro validation of bioluminescent monitoring of disease progression and therapeutic response in leukaemia model animals.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Arinobu Tojo; Rieko Sekine; Yasushi Soda; Seiichiro Kobayashi; Akiko Nomura; Kiyoko Izawa; Toshio Kitamura; Toshiyuki Okubo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Targeting the internal epitope of prostate-specific membrane antigen with 89Zr-7E11 immuno-PET.

Authors:  Alessandro Ruggiero; Jason P Holland; Tvrtko Hudolin; Larissa Shenker; Anna Koulova; Neil H Bander; Jason S Lewis; Jan Grimm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Preclinical imaging of therapy response using metabolic and apoptosis molecular imaging.

Authors:  Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Huijun Wang; Ellen Devos; Kathleen Vunckx; Lin Zhou; Chris Reutelingsperger; Alfons Verbruggen; Luc Mortelmans; Yicheng Ni; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Mistiming Death: Modeling the Time-Domain Variability of Tumor Apoptosis and Implications for Molecular Imaging of Cell Death.

Authors:  Seth T Gammon; Brian J Engel; Gregory J Gores; Erik Cressman; David Piwnica-Worms; Steven W Millward
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Bioluminescence imaging of therapy response does not correlate with FDG-PET response in a mouse model of Burkitt lymphoma.

Authors:  Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Ellen Devos; Abdelilah Ibrahimi; Zeger Debyser; Luc Mortelmans; Felix M Mottaghy
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-07-10

Review 8.  Avenues to molecular imaging of dying cells: Focus on cancer.

Authors:  Anna A Rybczynska; Hendrikus H Boersma; Steven de Jong; Jourik A Gietema; Walter Noordzij; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Philip H Elsinga; Aren van Waarde
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 12.944

9.  Molecular imaging of cell death in tumors. Increasing annexin A5 size reduces contribution of phosphatidylserine-targeting function to tumor uptake.

Authors:  Lisette Ungethüm; Martijn Chatrou; Dennis Kusters; Leon Schurgers; Chris P Reutelingsperger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.